Quote from Don Bright:
My response was posted, in which I stated that it appeared that you chose to take the full payout deal rather than the profit split. Although I don't have all the facts in front of me, please email or PM me with all the details, account numbers, Series 7 exam (date passed), and a time-line. I will certainly check into it.
I think the thread was closed, since it is not a current event that we have going. I don't want any more mis-understandings. 1 in 500 is still too many.
We always prefer to discuss the arrangements in person whenever possible.
I apologize for any concerns, and I will await your email.
don@stocktrading.com
Also, I agree about Rob, Darren, and the guys in BC.
Don
Don,
I think you are generally a good guy and I think Bright is one of the better prop firms in the industry. That said, I have to say that this STINKS.
I don't know by whom, or why, that guy's posts was deleted, but I think it needs to be put back in place by the moderators. It was 100% on topic, and was the result of the person's personal experience (not second hand). The only thing suspicious about the post was that it was the first ET post using that alias (raises a small red flag, I admit).
However, there was nothing in your reply to him to suggest that he was lying about his experience with Bright. Instead, you pointed out that you replied to his post, but when you go to that thread, we can see that his original post and your 'reply' have both been deleted and the thread is now closed.
Again, this stinks! IF they guy was telling the truth, then it sounds like he has a 100% reasonable complaint, and deserves an answer. Furthermore, to have a thread 'closed' retroactively due to an undesired, but honest post from someone with first hand experience seems to be unprecedented.
I would like to have an explanation on why the post was deleted.
I am a long time member of ET with no axe to grind on this issue. Also, if the guy was lying about this experience (and I know that this DOES happen as prop firms beat up on one another), then I would fully support you, Don. However, to have his post deleted like this without explanation, apparently simply due to pointing out his honest but dissatisfied experience with an ET sponsor's firm lessens the value of ET for all of us.
-Eric
P.S. I couldn't think of a better thread on which to post this reply, since the appropriate thread has now been closed and this thread has the only reference to the topic at hand.