Donald

Oh yes it certainly is.

EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SECTION 230
https://www.theverge.com/21273768/s...t-speech-law-definition-guide-free-moderation

"Private companies can also create rules to restrict speech if they so choose. This is why Facebook and Twitter ban hate speech, for example, even though it is legally permitted in the United States. These moderation rules are protected by the First Amendment as well.

This issue is distinct from discussions over whether platforms should be liable for what their users post, though it often gets lumped in with the 230 discussion."


See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230

They can still moderate/ban/block as they have been doing since before Trump.

Tell you what ... you and Trump should take it to court with Trump's dream team of lawyers.
 
EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SECTION 230
https://www.theverge.com/21273768/s...t-speech-law-definition-guide-free-moderation

"Private companies can also create rules to restrict speech if they so choose. This is why Facebook and Twitter ban hate speech, for example, even though it is legally permitted in the United States. These moderation rules are protected by the First Amendment as well.

This issue is distinct from discussions over whether platforms should be liable for what their users post, though it often gets lumped in with the 230 discussion."


See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230

They can still moderate/ban/block as they have been doing since before Trump.

Tell you what ... you and Trump should take it to court with Trump's dream team of lawyers.
psssst----that's called editing.
 
Back
Top