Donald

Covertibility said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1225213415347630080



84993871_10157939173367346_5940599498819502080_n.jpg
More...


Can clap funny and tear up paper but cannot get a conviction in her scam sham impeachment.

I guess that is what success looks like to you tards.

Good. Maybe she will give Trump the finger after she loses the 2020 elections for the dems. That should send a tingle up your leg, and be even better than winning. Yeh, that's it. Better than winning the election.
 
Thursday, February 06, 2020

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-nine percent (49%) disapprove.
 
https://twitter.com/x/status/1225227914062520322


There was no way the R's were going to convict. Trump exists to keep the Whiteys in check while running the Republican Establishment's agenda of tax cuts for the rich, increase govt spending on defense, rollbacks of regulations that benefit the oil & gas industry and the future cuts to the entitlement programs. The Whiteys are too dumb to realize what's really going on.
 
Tony Stark said:
View attachment 218657


View attachment 218659





Rasmussen 2018,Republicans +1

upload_2020-2-6_0-6-1-png.218619
More...
As can be seen here, election betting odds are much better than polls.---You have proved my point. Thank you.

https://www.politicalbettingodds.com/2012-us-presidential-election-odds.html

Update: President Obama was able to win re-election last night versus Mitt Romney. For oddsmakers, it didn't really come as a surprise... at times yesterday Obama was better than a 1 to 4 favorite to win a second term and he did just that. Unfortunately, with odds like those, no one got rich off of Obama's win considering that a $1 wager paid $.25 ($1.25 total).

And, on Monday we posted odds for the race with a handicapped electoral vote total which is still in question because most sources have not awarded Florida's 29 electoral votes yet. As it stands current, Obama leads the electoral vote with a total of 303 votes to Romney's 206. The handicapped line for that wager was 90.5 electoral votes. Just by doing some simple math, you see that Obama currently holds a 97 vote lead which would be good enough to cover the spread/handicap BUT, those 29 electoral votes could end up swinging that wager back in favor of Romney. The handicapped bet was the only Obama wager that actually paid more than what was wagered... Obama was getting +220 payouts to win by 91 or more electoral votes which means a $1 wager paid $2.20 ($3.20 total).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top