Donald

[Bugenhagen]

Trump is not about politics, if he was within a couple of standard deviations off normal ok, but he is too extreme and so it is not about liberal or conservative politics but how a malignant narcissist takes control and attracts his useful supporters.

The same thing happened in countries all over the world that have authoritarian dictators. In this regard Trump is not that special. Back in the day with Goldwater and Nixon there was no DSM manual but now everyone has the same scorecard to tick off.

Focusing on policy instead of the obvious issue, the level of threat he poses.

 

[Tony Stark]

I mentioned it as a part of a factset that shows his almost incomparable personal success.

Compared to others who were handed inheritances and empires similar to his his personal success isnt that impressive.

 

[Tony Stark]

There is more in our world than Trump.

Agreed.Don't get so triggered when someone posts a quote from one of his college professors.

 

[Cuddles]

40+ new groping/assault allegations:
https://www.esquire.com/news-politi...-karen-johnson-all-the-presidents-women-book/

Donald Trump Allegedly Hid Behind a Tapestry to Grope a Woman at Mar-a-Lago in the Early 2000s
In an exclusive excerpt from All the President’s Women, Karen Johnson, one of 43 women with new allegations against the president, tells her story.

 

[Bugenhagen]

It was not just his daddy that kept him going, he was rescued by his shareholders who forced him to hire the Trump Organisation's first CFO.

https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1991-04-28-1991118079-story.html

 

[Bugenhagen]

Agreed.Don't get so triggered when someone posts a quote from one of his college professors.

He may listen better to one of his generation's professors.

“If you ever start taking things too seriously, just remember that we are talking monkeys on an organic spaceship flying through the universe.”

― Joe Rogan

Which I agree with except for bears and toddlers with nuclear weapons.

 

[maximumpossiblesuffering]

Trump is not about politics, if he was within a couple of standard deviations off normal ok, but he is too extreme and so it is not about liberal or conservative politics but how a malignant narcissist takes control and attracts his useful supporters.

The same thing happened in countries all over the world that have authoritarian dictators. In this regard Trump is not that special. Back in the day with Goldwater and Nixon there was no DSM manual but now everyone has the same scorecard to tick off.

Focusing on policy instead of the obvious issue, the level of threat he poses.

Can you think of any politicians, news reporters, media mongols, Hollywood stars, and Tech executives that would meet the criteria of malignant narcissism?

Other than Trump?

What would you propose should be done about these people?

How about the actions of a person, or a group of people that harm the interests of others, especially on a large scale, whether it involves civil rights or economic opportunities?

How about the inaction of a person or a group of people who has been entrusted to defend the interests of a large group of people, but fails to do so for personal gain? Should that person or organization be punished in some way? Should this punishment include being removed from power?

You are smart enough to know where I’m going with this, but are too chickenshit to discuss this subject in depth, right?

As we all know, Trump has his quirks, but he is working to address many serious issues facing our country and Democrats are fighting him every step of the way.

Trump may be a little too bad to be considered good, but hopefully Trump is good enough to be considered not bad. This is better than what we can rationally say about most Democrats.

 

[Spike Trader]

Campaign monies go straight into his personal bank account ?

 

[Bugenhagen]

Can you think of any politicians, news reporters, media mongols, Hollywood stars, and Tech executives that would meet the criteria of malignant narcissism?

Other than Trump?

What would you propose should be done about these people?

How about the actions of a person, or a group of people that harm the interests of others, especially on a large scale, whether it involves civil rights or economic opportunities?

How about the inaction of a person or a group of people who has been entrusted to defend the interests of a large group of people, but fails to do so for personal gain? Should that person or organization be punished in some way? Should this punishment include being removed from power?

You are smart enough to know where I’m going with this, but are too chickenshit to discuss this subject in depth, right?

As we all know, Trump has his quirks, but he is working to address many serious issues facing our country and Democrats are fighting him every step of the way.

Trump may be a little too bad to be considered good, but hopefully Trump is good enough to be considered not bad. This is better than what we can rationally say about most Democrats.

You are just too reaching there in butwhatabout but but but the dem party is narcissist even.

 

[Bugenhagen]

Campaign monies go straight into his personal bank account ?




View attachment 212025

You don't stay rich by spending money on little people who can't reach you. He has done the same his whole life. Could be considered an idiot tax following the Secret Service's requests for police assistance.

Cities of America, learn from Bone Spurs, how much of a world class tourist attraction is Dallas since the 60s? UUge tourist dollars. You could win the lottery by not providing assistance.