https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...s-turning-into-a-racist-hes-blowing-very-hard
Scaramucci says Trump is 'turning into' a racist
Last edited:
Donald
- Thread starter Buy1Sell2
- Start date
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...s-turning-into-a-racist-hes-blowing-very-hard
Scaramucci says Trump is 'turning into' a racist
He has now failed on every front.
Tomorrow is the true beginning of the end for the Left Wing Cabal that attempted a coup on President Trump. Mueller will be exposed as a biased miscreant who had no reason to continue an investigation after the first months. Jim Jordan will tear him apart. Even Gerald Nadler now wants to eliminate questions from committee members as he now recognizes that having Mueller testify will backfire.
House Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., asked Mueller if his probe was “curtailed or stopped or hindered” at any point. Mueller replied, “no.”
---and there you have it. For on the one hand you can't contend that Trump obstructed justice and then turn around and say you were never hindered. Thus the beginning of the end for the Left Wing Cabal has now begun. You'll notice that Mueller was not going to say anything about the origins of the Russian thing. It will come out (already has). ----LOVE THIS HEARING!---
All this hoopla is really cover for the Clintons who had tried to rig the election.
B1... lets refresh your memory here ok.
The obstruction-of-justice investigation began a day or two after Trump fired Comey. That occurred on May 9th, 2017. Therefore one must assume the investigation was focused on what happened prior to that date.
Mueller wasn't appointed special counsel until later that month. Therefore, saying he was never “curtailed, stopped, or hindered with regards to his investigation" and hence "no obstruction-of-justice occurred" has absolutely nothing to do with the actual alleged obstruction-of-justice he was appointed to investigate. Can you see that bud?
Therefore this statement by you:
"For on the one hand you can't contend that Trump obstructed justice and then turn around and say you were never hindered."
... is a completely illogical, ignorant of the facts, and borderline stupid.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...e02506-5131-11e7-b064-828ba60fbb98_story.html
Last edited:
B1... lets refresh your memory here ok.
The obstruction-of-justice investigation began a day or two after Trump fired Comey. That occurred on May 9th, 2017. Therefore one must assume the investigation was focused on what happened prior to that date.
Mueller wasn't appointed special counsel until later that month. Therefore, saying he was never “curtailed, stopped, or hindered with regards to his investigation" and hence "no obstruction-of-justice occurred" has absolutely nothing to do with the actual alleged obstruction-of-justice he was appointed to investigate. Can you see that bud?
Therefore this statement by you:
"For on the one hand you can't contend that Trump obstructed justice and then turn around and say you were never hindered."
... is a completely illogical, ignorant of the facts, and borderline stupid.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...e02506-5131-11e7-b064-828ba60fbb98_story.html
Is 13 colonies history considered US history?
