Donald Trump Will Win!

AAAintheBeltway said:
LOL, this is why I like you. You come up with some great one liners...err you were parodying the media, weren't you?
More...

A few months back I challenged Freddie to name one thing about this current administration that he did not care for...Mind you, by the second term in Dubya's administration, even his staunchest defenders were throwing in the towel...

Lo and behold, Freddie was radio silent...Finally, I challenged him to read the Taibbi article about the former AG...Taibbi is no "right wing zealot"; I asked him if he found anything to criticize at that point...I think I received some sort of "hemming and hawing" type of answer...

The fact that this clown car of leftist's can never, ever make one critique of "their side" is absolutely baffling...Meanwhile, Ricter sets up straw men arguments every other day to imply that everybody on "the other side" plays the same game...Nothing could be further from the truth...

Even at this stage of the game, you would think that there is 100% solidarity behind Hillary...Just take a look at that mess of a convention...Are any of these clown's going to acknowledge the long list of grievances by the Bernie die-hards...Doubtful...They will simply pretend none of it is happening
 
marcoPolo21 said:
do you have any Money on the election?
you can get around 2-1 odds; not bad if you're so sure :p

[i bet about 5 bitcoins on the woman]

he could win but, at least today, i don't see how
[if he somehow changes in the debates :rolleyes: , he Might have a chance]

marc
:D
More...

Nobody has seen "how" he has gotten this far to begin with...Those "solidly blue" states from 2008 and 2012 are suddenly "up for grab's"...Even that fat POS Michael Moore is nervous and talking about a win (remember this guy is from one of those "up for grab" states and knows that his blue collar message resonates)...
 
Covertibility said:
The request to investigate the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation on charges of “public corruption” was made in a July 15 letter by 64 House Republicans to the IRS, FBI and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). They charged the foundation is “lawless.”

The initiative is being led by Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican who serves as the vice chairwoman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which oversees FTC. The FTC regulates public charities alongside the IRS.

The lawmakers charged the Clinton Foundation is a “lawless ‘pay-to-play’ enterprise that has been operating under a cloak of philanthropy for years and should be investigated.”

-----------
---------

Moar manufactured scandals.
More...

Ah yes, so only one side of the aisle "manufactures scandals"...
 
you are now changing the question and still bullshitting your ass off.

this is not just theory its fact... investors consider yield after taxes...
for instance....



Tax-Equivalent Yield
Otherwise known as TEY, tax-equivalent yield is used to determine the difference in potential return between municipal bonds and taxable bonds. The formula is as follows: Bond yield / (100% minus your tax rate). (For more, see: Why Retirees Can't Count on Muni Bonds.)

If you don’t like mathematical formulas and this seems complicated, let’s simplify it. Say the yield on a municipal bond is 6% and you’re in the 35% tax bracket. TEY = 6% (this is the yield on the municipal bond) / (1 – 0.35). This comes to 9.23%. So 6% / 0.65 = 9.23%.

The point is that a municipal bond with a 6% yield will offer a better return than many taxable bonds with higher yields.



Read more: Muni Bonds vs. Taxable Bonds and CDs | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/article...ds-vs-taxable-bonds-and-cds.asp#ixzz4FppizcTV
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook


Ricter said:
Your counter argument is only theory, and who's going to argue with that since imagining extreme scenarios is easy. You have not presented any evidence that today's tax rates are suppressing today's investment activity.

I already have what I believe is your best demonstration in mind, and I'm considering my answer. Hope to see you there soon.
More...
 
Frederick Foresight said:
The bigger question is, why wouldn't an ardent supporter of his want to have it seen to vindicate his hero? Unless, perhaps, you're also afraid of what might be lurking there.

http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/web/presidentialtaxreturns

What are you (and he) so afraid of? Do you even know, or is it a dawning and vague suspicion, possibly prompted by his steadfast evasiveness?
More...
He is being audited and has been audited in the past. I assume there is nothing illegal or wrong whatsoever with his tax returns. However, libtards will make up all sorts of shit and completely lie implying there are issues. Plus they will focus on the effective tax rate with no understanding of the effective tax and why it is what it is. You very well know that the libtards want them released to be able the make up lies about his tax returns. Libtards will try to make that the entire focus and that is all they will talk about.

If the IRS signs off on them, why does it matter?

There is no requirement to do it so why do it? Just because libtards want him to?

Libtards were successful wrt implying that Romney was an immoral disgusting human being when he did nothing wrong whatsoever and paid all of his owed taxes.
 
Last edited:
Frederick Foresight said:
Yes.

I won't pretend to know the details regarding the foundation, but I know it does good work.

What I find puzzling is that people here who support Trump are defending his not disclosing his tax returns. How could that be? His business savvy is the very thing he purports to bring to the table. That's it. That's the only think that differentiated him from the other candidates. His tax returns would validate his claims of business and financial acumen. I think we both know enough about Trump to know that if the tax returns were in any way flattering, he would be quick to disclose them; it is his very nature to show off. Yeah, he's all about the sizzle, but where's the steak?
More...
He owns 2 private jets and 3 helicopters. Do you have any idea how much it cost to buy those type of jets and how much the maintenance cost annually? Do you know how much it cost to fly those plans per hour?

Obviously, you don't. It is extremely expensive. If he didn't have a lot of money, there is no way he could own those aircraft.
 
Ricter said:
If it's so simple, then please share with us the metrics proving it.
More...

Sure. It's called tax havens. Something like 40 trillion is held offshore.

Same reason why us corps have ~3 trillion offshore instead of domiciled in America. Why pay more
 
achilles28 said:
Sure. It's called tax havens. Something like 40 trillion is held offshore.

Same reason why us corps have ~3 trillion offshore instead of domiciled in America. Why pay more
More...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ok, why do YOU talk about immigrants need to prove patriotism? You say immigrants"held to higher standard". Why do you excused wealthy Americans hiding money from tax? Is that patriotism?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top