Removing Saddam Hussein and Khadaffi in order to spread "freedom and democracy" surely was a huge success in those countries.
Donald Trump Will Win!
- Thread starter Speculate
- Start date
Removing Saddam Hussein and Khadaffi in order to spread "freedom and democracy" surely was a huge success in those countries.
The man who's never wrong: the legend continues...
On Iraq:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...still-wrong-his-claim-opposed-iraq-war-ahead/
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...-iraq-war-thats-not-how-i-remember-it/462804/
On Libya:
Last edited:
Stop trying to pass the buck for the complete failures of libtards. This wouldn't even be in the media if it weren't for libtards leaving their servers wide open for anyone to see.
Last edited:
Meanwhile the DNC convention is so emptied out they are hiring actors to fill the seats...
Maybe Freddie, Ricter and the rest of libtards can road trip out there and do their thing.
Maybe Freddie, Ricter and the rest of libtards can road trip out there and do their thing.
http://www.snopes.com/dnc-hiring-actors-via-craigslist-to-replace-delegates/
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/rnc-2016-worst-convention-historians-214091
http://fortune.com/2016/07/27/democrat-republicans-convention-tv-ratings/
Yeah, you guys sure have a lot to crow about.
How's Chachi?
Last edited:
I find the contrast in the two conventions to be fascinating.
Neither ran all that smoothly but democracy is a messy business.
The republican convention featured serious people confronting serious issues, eg terrorism, immigration, domestic rioting and turmoil, attacks on police.
By contrast, the democrats are in a parallel universe. They featured a collection of representatives of the racial grievance industry, plus the usual Hollywood and entertainment airheads. Their signature moment was to honor the mothers of thugs killed while fighting the police. The media, which seem to demand that Trump disavow someone or some random tweet hourly, had no interest in connecting the dots between BLM anti police demagoguery and the murders of police officers. Likewise, horrific terror attacks in Europe were ignored.
The democrats' message was basically BLM is right, we need open borders and immediate amnesty, and anyone who disagrees is a racist bigot, particularly Trump.
The media's take was the republicans were "dark" and appealed to "hate" and "fear." The democrats' nonstop demonization of Trump was good clean fun, plus something the voters need to hear.
I don't really understand the democrats' approach. Surely they have the black vote locked up. Why all the pandering? Did Obama demand it or is it just reflexive for them now? Wouldn't it have been smarter to try to broaden their appeal?
The silver lining is that both party establishments and the media have pretty much been dead wrong the entire election season and have badly misread the mood of the voters.
Neither ran all that smoothly but democracy is a messy business.
The republican convention featured serious people confronting serious issues, eg terrorism, immigration, domestic rioting and turmoil, attacks on police.
By contrast, the democrats are in a parallel universe. They featured a collection of representatives of the racial grievance industry, plus the usual Hollywood and entertainment airheads. Their signature moment was to honor the mothers of thugs killed while fighting the police. The media, which seem to demand that Trump disavow someone or some random tweet hourly, had no interest in connecting the dots between BLM anti police demagoguery and the murders of police officers. Likewise, horrific terror attacks in Europe were ignored.
The democrats' message was basically BLM is right, we need open borders and immediate amnesty, and anyone who disagrees is a racist bigot, particularly Trump.
The media's take was the republicans were "dark" and appealed to "hate" and "fear." The democrats' nonstop demonization of Trump was good clean fun, plus something the voters need to hear.
I don't really understand the democrats' approach. Surely they have the black vote locked up. Why all the pandering? Did Obama demand it or is it just reflexive for them now? Wouldn't it have been smarter to try to broaden their appeal?
The silver lining is that both party establishments and the media have pretty much been dead wrong the entire election season and have badly misread the mood of the voters.
Please provide proof that Russia is behind the hack of the DNC servers. I watched MSNBS the other day and the only "proof" that they provided was that Russia has the capability. Many countries and people have the capability to hack a server. I have seen zero proof that Russia was behind the attack. Another example of libtards making shit up and believing it.
Clearly libtards are incompetent morons.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/25/politics/democratic-convention-dnc-emails-russia/
Sources: US officials warned DNC of hack months before the party acted
(CNN)Federal investigators tried to warn the Democratic National Committee about a potential intrusion in their computer network months before the party moved to try to fix the problem, U.S. officials briefed on the probe tell CNN.
The revelation raises questions about whether the DNC could have done more to limit the damage done by hackers suspected of working for Russian intelligence.
I suspect Mr. Robot.