Donald Trump Criticizes Muslim Family of Slain U.S. Soldier, Drawing Ire

13879433_10154425159082360_8994211218286838719_n.jpg
 
Media hypocrisy about grieving parents on full display

media.jpg


The media found a new hero in the grieving parents of fallen soldier Humayun S.M. Khan, they delivered a scathing speech against Donald Trump at the DNC and are publicly mourning their son by campaigning for Hillary Clinton.

Despite that several statements in Khan’s speech were hyperbole and just well done political theater, the media has praised them as redefining American politics.

Yet when Pat Smith, the mother of a victim of the terrorist attack in Benghazi spoke she was fact checked and attacked by members of the mainstream media.

Chris Matthews bashed Smith, calling her comments “a gross accusation” and said of the grieving widow “I don’t care what that woman felt.”

No one in the mainstream media made similar comments about the Khan’s strange accusation that Trump wouldn’t have allowed them to immigrate to America, hasn’t read the constitution, and that the Equal Protection clause somehow protects foreign citizens.


The most glaring display of the media’s hypocrisy is Steve Benen who writes for Rachel Maddow’s website. He said the RNC was manipulating the grief of a mother who lost her son but praised the DNC for doing the same exact thing.

The Khans are just the latest in a long line of grieving victims that the Democrat use to attack Republicans and the media spends the entire election cycle obsessing about, just ask Cindy Sheehan, Kristen Breitweiser, and Joe Soptic.


http://theamericanmirror.com/medias-hypocrisy-grieving-parents-full-display/#more-16663

This. The mainstream media are hopelessly corrupt. I can make a good living betting against them when it comes time to discern the truth
 
There's no real way for Trump to win this argument and a wiser man would have known better than to be baited into this Cindy Sheehan type senerio...
That's really the instructive part here. Even if the Khans had not volunteered to speak (they did), if the dems had set this up as a trap, its simplicity really should only trap a noob politician, maybe someone running for small town mayor or the like.
 
Trump: Ha ha, look at parents of the fallen soldier. He won't even let her speak. Typical Muslims!

Ha ha, look at the spastic disabled guy!

Look at Meghan Kelley and all the bleeding the bimbo is doing!

Ha ha, look at the suckers that bought into all the frauds I perpetrated and lost money!




Ha ha look at anything other than me, because I'm disgusting, classless, greedy, callous, capitalist pig that is very very ignorant about virtually everything outside of my con man business.
 
[ Trend QUOTE="vanzandt, post: 4311514, member: 493912"]Kahn said:..... "Who have you ever lost?"

I say.... "OK....Who has Hillary ever lost?".

I mean come on. WTF? Its BS. Its all made for TV drama.

But if it works on the mindless majority, which it does.... Women, Blacks, Hispanics, and Millennials will ensure a Clinton victory.

Adjust your portfolio accordingly.

Oil is going up.[/QUOTE]
%%
Van;your oil trend comments are much better than your minority '' prediction''-hildabeast could not even beat a greenhorn jr senator. But NRA endorsed Trump-Pence ;Hilabeast wants to tax [infringe on ] guns to pay for ACA TRAINWRECK========================================================================================== Thats delusional to pretend all hispanics are for illegal aliens.LOL Thanks for trend comment; not a prediction.
 
That's really the instructive part here. Even if the Khans had not volunteered to speak (they did), if the dems had set this up as a trap, its simplicity really should only trap a noob politician, maybe someone running for small town mayor or the like.
Well comrade, I must agree. Every time he does something like this it lends more credibility to the accusations being made that he is too thin skinned, exercises poor judgement, and is a loose cannon. Can he be trusted with such power that comes with the presidency? Independents are likely to sway towards Hillary if this continues.
Hillary is your typical establishment hack, and criminally corrupt to her core, BUT, she is a known quantity and predictable. Trump? Who the hell knows what he'll do. He's losing ground every time he opens his mouth.
 
Well comrade, I must agree. Every time he does something like this it lends more credibility to the accusations being made that he is too thin skinned, exercises poor judgement, and is a loose cannon. Can he be trusted with such power that comes with the presidency? Independents are likely to sway towards Hillary if this continues.
Hillary is your typical establishment hack, and criminally corrupt to her core, BUT, she is a known quantity and predictable. Trump? Who the hell knows what he'll do. He's losing ground every time he opens his mouth.
At one time I thought, hoped, if Trump wins, then the old saw, "the secretaries actually run this company" would prove to be true. But Trump has his kids running things.

I really wish Hillary didn't have all the baggage she does, I really do. And of course for me she's simply not far enough left, not by a long shot (neither was Obama). But you're right, she's a known quantity. I would say we could expect the country to at least not move backwards under her presidency, that we could expect a rerun of Clinton I (good years), or Obama. But no doubt someone will bring up the likely SC justices she'll get to appoint, and scream bloody murder.
:D
 
Back
Top