The Washington Post has had daily opinion pieces by various sportswriter morons advocating that the league take the team away from him.
I'm not defending Sterling any more than I defend Bundy. Bundy is probably more defensible. Sterling is either borderline senile or just willfully self-destructive.
Still. It bothers me that a guy can be punished with little in the way of due process for a thought crime. Let's say he is hopelessly prejudiced. So what? The laws prohibit discriminatory actions, not thoughts or private words.
Liberals are passionate about defending free speech and unpopular positions, provided they agree with them. when it is something that runs afoul of their PC code, then the gloves come off. Their first instinct is to try to destroy the person. We saw it with the traditional marriage referendum in california. They are still out trying to ferret out supporters of that so they can be persecuted. These are the same people who celebrate the Hollywood communists of the 1950's as some kind of national heroes because they faced the same kind of persecution. The difference is Sterling is not trying to convert anybody. He was having an argument with his 25 year old GF.
It is not a "thought crime", he flapped his hole and got caught. In blabbus veritus.
By the way, your previous post, were you referring to all "blacks"?
