There is no question that the election was stolen. It remains to be seen whether or not voting machine manipulation was involved.will cling to anything that will legitimize their "stolen election" conspiracy bullshit
There is no question that the election was stolen. It remains to be seen whether or not voting machine manipulation was involved.will cling to anything that will legitimize their "stolen election" conspiracy bullshit
Yes, "discoverrry!" and their weekend of hopium dab rips.These copecels will cling to anything that will legitimize their "stolen election" conspiracy bullshit
There is no question that the election was stolen. It remains to be seen whether or not voting machine manipulation was involved.
What if it's shown to be true that voting machines were manipulated?
There is no question that the election was stolen. It remains to be seen whether or not voting machine manipulation was involved.
Read paragraph 140 on page 76 of that lawsuit. (thanks for the link.)
With a fawning introduction and credulous coverage, Carlson endorsed Lindell's lie that he "found" the "machine fraud and "ha(s) all the evidence"
a. does this mean Carlson said those words in quotes or Lindell.
That is such an important distinction... there should not be partial out of context quotes there.
Plaintiff's lawyers seem to being a bit tricky there.
b. if we presume they not claiming Carlson himself said anything defamatory... then basically plaintiff is saying Carlson is liable for the words of his guests...
that is not the law as it exists right now. .
They have plenty of video evidence. Just like the Biden laptop stolen while Tucker was involved in the chain of custody. Remember?