Quote from jem:
This reserve currency concept is most likely nothing but a archaic idea like the Triffin dilemna (earlier link) Once we left the Bretton Woods system... being the dollar lost its edge...
Remember when Giselle made news by insisting on being paid in Euros. Every seller and buyer and choose the currency.
So what does reserve currency do for the U.S. nothing but perhaps force some people to have to arrange for a currency change when the dollar hits their account electronically.
If a country like China wants to peg to the dollar that is a strategic choice to be unnaturally competitive in the U.S. market. it is not because we are the reserve currency.
So what is left... the internet guys say that it is important that oil sells in dollars.... I just do not see why. Saudi get dollars and then they can buy gold or euros or hard assets... its not like they are stuck with dollars. I suppose in a sense if the money stays parked in dollars in an electronic account... it is as Dr. Zhivago said and interest free loan...
The Triffin Dilemma is alive and well. Think about it - As the world economy grows, so too should the supply of the reserve currency. But for the reserve currency to grow, someone has to "create" it. It must export this currency. And what happens when you export a currency? You consume, right? A trade deficit develops - but it can't exist forever, no?
Also, central banks do not go to the FOREX to exchange dollars like you and I. Here's how it works. Countries conduct trade using a reserve currency - why? Because most multinationals don't want to use other volatile currencies - they want certainty. And when these multinationals accumulate a lot of a reserve currency, they exchange it at their bank, which in turn exchanges it with the national central bank.
Now central banks can't just trade these reserve accumulations like you and I can. To do so would upset the markets and cause a flood of phone calls from pissed off countries. So what did they traditionally do with these dollar assets? Well, to get a income, they bought US Treasuries with the excess dollars. Why sit on a pile of dollars, when you can earn interest. And thus, the US Treasury market became the top sovereign debt market in the world - the exorbitant privilege.
But here's the kicker. That process is going in reverse - slowly but surely. As I mentioned, bilateral trade agreements are a growing trend. Holders of US debt are slowly divesting, or not buying as much as they used to. No one can do it suddenly, as that would be extremely volatile and akin to a full blown currency war.
But there is one more thing we need to keep in mind. Under the Bretton Woods gold standard, dollars were gold - a pure asset. So Central Banks around the world sat on accumulations of TRUE ASSETS. Today, what do they sit on? Sovereign debts of trading partners - A LIABILITY HAS NOW BECOME AN ASSET.
That change from storing a pure asset - gold - to storing the debt of a trading partner - an asset that is someone else's liability - has created the huge trade imbalances we see today and created the massive global debt bubble that is about to pop.
I agree with Rennick, that the system will likely go, and as a result, a pure asset will once again be used. And not because governments want to be constrained by a gold or silver standard, but because there will be nothing left to replace the current system.
Global monetary systems are dictated by global powers, usually after a war. But what happens when the world becomes increasingly multilateral? Who dictates what? Either a war determines the outcome, or a this unsustainable system ends, gold or silver, by default returns.
Ask yourself, why do central banks store gold? It's an insurance hedge against collapse of the current fiat debt-based system.