DOJ reopened Hillary's email case and considering plea deal?

[jem]

you are no attorney and your dnc b.s. is not fooling anyone.

everybody knows she is at risk of felony prosecution. Not only does that article admit she could be liable for felonies...

it was written long before the destruction and bleach bit of evidence happened. It was written long before her top aide and lover was sending all the messages off site to her "husbands" computer happened. (who has ties to the muslim brotherhood.)

There are so many felonies and so many national security issues in play... she would have had to funnel $750,000 dollars the wife of the lead fbi investigator and her husband with have had to cut an illegal deal on the tarmac to not be tried and found guilty.





2. is anyone saying this is not gossip? go ahead mark it. I call it gossip.

1. Absolute bullshit, not a single non-partisan lawyer or prosecutor has said that, Comey outright said she didn't break any laws. An OCA cannot be prosecuted for using her powers as an OCA or receiving unsolicited emails from people who had clearance. Never mind the fact that not a single one of the emails were properly marked to establish intent and intent to do what exactly?

2. This is not a 'leak', the gossip columnist is asking a QUESTION, was the WH transcript leak a 'national security' leak?

3. I am 100% sure this is fake news and I will bump this thread when it's proven as usual (just like that Seth Rich BS)

 

[Spike Trader]

2. is anyone saying this is not gossip? go ahead mark it. I call it gossip.

Is Jem saying the article is BS ?

 

[exGOPer]

you are no attorney and your dnc b.s. is not fooling anyone.

everybody knows she is at risk of felony prosecution. Not only does that article admit she could be liable for felonies...

it was written long before the destruction and bleach bit of evidence happened. It was written long before her top aide and lover was sending all the messages off site to her "husbands" computer happened. (who has ties to the muslim brotherhood.)

There are so many felonies and so many national security issues in play... she would have had to funnel $750,000 dollars the wife of the lead fbi investigator and her husband with have had to cut an illegal deal on the tarmac to not be tried and found guilty.





2. is anyone saying this is not gossip? go ahead mark it. I call it gossip.

'Everybody knows' except Comey and legal experts who aren't Republicans

Even assuming your 'destruction' part, FOIA is not a criminal law.

There are no other 'felonies' in play, DOJ is not even investigating Hillary, but thanks for inserting all your talking points into one incoherent nonsense, your guy fired the guy investigating his collusion and yet you are talking about tarmacs.

 

[jem]

is gossip always wrong?

Is Jem saying the article is BS ?

'Everybody knows' except Comey and legal experts who aren't Republicans

Even assuming your 'destruction' part, FOIA is not a criminal law.

There are no other 'felonies' in play, DOJ is not even investigating Hillary, but thanks for inserting all your talking points into one incoherent nonsense, your guy fired the guy investigating his collusion and yet you are talking about tarmacs.

 

[jem]

that is the old the experts say or don't say canard.

What usually happens is a judge reads the law to the jury and then the jury decides if the elements of the law were broken. Jury instructions break down the law so that a layman can understand them and find if the defendant is guilty or not guilty.

You don't need to be a legal expert to figure out if a law was broken.

In fact if you did need an expert ... that law could be unconstitutionally vague.

if you look at what she did she could be held libel for numerous felonies. Those laws are discussed in a credible fashion by numerous sources from t.v. news shows to serious articles to senators and congressman discussing them. . I have given some of them to you before.

arguing hillary could not be tried for felonies is a dnc lie.

'Everybody knows' except Comey and legal experts who aren't Republicans

Even assuming your 'destruction' part, FOIA is not a criminal law.

There are no other 'felonies' in play, DOJ is not even investigating Hillary, but thanks for inserting all your talking points into one incoherent nonsense, your guy fired the guy investigating his collusion and yet you are talking about tarmacs.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Absolute horseshit from you as usual, you cleverly left out the 'knowingly removes' part, you think no one would notice that?

.

Heh, she sets a complete offline server system in her house to handle and traffic in government business and you think that a prosecutor could not establish the "knowingly" part. Good luck wit dat. Perhaps you are thinking Loretta's Justice Department is still there to lap up that shiite. News Flash! She ain't. Let the grand jury decide.

 

[piezoe]

It is amazing to me how many people are wiling to buy into these stories without a second thought.

 

[jem]

its not the gossip story that makes her guilty as sin... it simply triggers our hope the swamp will be cleaned and Hillary will have her day in court. I have a slight hope that she gets her day in court.

I would like to see if she can convince her peers... not democrats but everyone that she is innocent. As as far as I am concerned justice will be served even if she were to be found innocent after a fair trial.

I am a process guy.

It is amazing to me how many people are wiling to buy into these stories without a second thought.

 

[piezoe]

This is one you'll like. I say run with it!

 

[newwurldmn]

Too bad that Barry did not subscribe to your "you are either okay with it or not" philosophy. He had a conditional approach to it. "If it looks like Hillary is still going to win, I am okay" and then when she loses "we can't have this."

I am going to take a wild and crazy guess that you won't be questioning his patriotism.

Prior to an election it's tricky to accuse a foreign power of interfering. however, Obama did with respect to the emails. Obama was also aware that the Trump campaign was talking to the Russians but it's difficult to call out your opponent on a pretty serious charge without all the evidence laid it. It takes time to lay out that evidence. But they were doing the investigations. Of course, Trump is accusing Obama of political espionage. But he's not credible when he talks about being the victim.

Trump even insinuated on times that the Russians were influencing the election. And Hillary made many public claims about it. The fact that Trump asked the hackers to release more emails is also an interesting point on this topic.