DOJ Clears FBI Informant In Clinton-Era Russian Bribery Scandal To Testify OCT 25, 2017 8:52 PM

DOJ Clears FBI Informant In Clinton-Era Russian Bribery Scandal To Testify


by Tyler Durden
Oct 25, 2017 8:52 PM
1.2K
SHARES


Update (8:40 pm ET): The FBI informant who helped the Justice Department secure a conviction against the top official from the US subsidiary of Rosatom, the Russian atomic energy agency, but was blocked by the Obama Justice Department from testifying about Russian efforts to bribe and extort their way into possession of North American uranium assets - a process which was cleared by both Hillary Clinton's State Department and Robert Mueller's FBI - has as of moments ago been cleared to testify, the Justice Department announced on Wednesday evening.

https://twitter.com/brookefoxnews


✔@brookefoxnews

#breaking : DOJ allows FBI informant to provide information to Congress on alleged corruption or bribery in transactions for #UraniumOne

8:01 PM - Oct 25, 2017



The informant, who has yet to be named - perhaps out of concerns about his or her life - is being represented by Victoria Toensing, a former Reagan Justice Department official and former chief counsel of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Toensing joined Grassley in urging Attorney General Jeff Sessions to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the Uranium One deal, which was approved in 2011 by a committee on which former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sat. Around the time the deal was approved, Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speaking fee from a bank with ties to the Russian government, as well as millions more in "charitable contributions" to the Clinton Foundation from entities with ties to the Russian government. Russia’s Tenex nuclear sales arm also secured billions in new American nuclear fuel contracts around the same time.

The Obama administration said at the time they saw no national security reasons to block the deals, one of which gave Vladimir Putin control of 20 percent of America’s uranium stockpile. But last week a series of stories published in The Hill disclosed that before those decisions were made, the FBI had gathered extensive evidence that Vadim Mikerin. Tenex’s chief executive inside the United States, was directing a massive bribery scheme that compromised an American trucking company that shipped uranium for Russia.

The evidence was first gathered in 2009 but charges weren’t brought until 2014. Mikerin pled guilt a year later to a money laundering charge and is currently in prison.

But key members of Congress said they weren’t alerted to the case at the time and are now deeply concerned the Obama administration had a good security reason not to approve the deals given the corruption was uncovered.

Now, finally, we are about to hear the full story.

* * *

“This cries out for a special counsel,” Toensing said on Fox News' “Hannity” Tuesday night. “Congressional committees are fine, but this is a criminal investigation and Jeff Sessions isn’t ever going to feel comfortable appointing that, and Rod Rosenstein is recused because he was the U.S. attorney.”

Toensing added that while Sessions can technically appoint a special counsel, he likely was “not going to be comfortable doing it.”

“He ought to get somebody in here and get this off their hands,” Toensing said.

According to the Hill, Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores confirmed the informant had been cleared to speak with Congress for the first time, nearly eight years after he first went undercover for the FBI. Two House committees, as well as the Senate Judiciary Committee, are investigating the deal. And the informant will now probably testify before one, or perhaps all, of the committees.




✔@brookefoxnews

.@ChuckGrassley & FBI informant's attorney Victoria Toensing called for special counsel to investigate #UraniumOnehttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/25/grassley-calls-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-uranium-one-deal.html … https://twitter.com/brookefoxnews/status/923338750729605120 …

8:09 PM - Oct 25, 2017

Grassley calls for special counsel to investigate Uranium One deal
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is calling for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the Obama-era Uranium One deal, amid new revelations about the arrangement that...








“As of tonight, the Department of Justice has authorized the informant to disclose to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, as well as one member of each of their staffs, any information or documents he has concerning alleged corruption or bribery involving transactions in the uranium market, including but not limited to anything related to Vadim Mikerin, Rosatom, Tenex, Uranium One, or the Clinton Foundation,” she said.

Earlier, Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., threatened to use his subpoena power to get access to the informant, who had signed an NDA with the FBI and was unable to speak publicly about Uranium One.

NY Rep. Peter King during an appearance on Fox News accused the FBI of stonewalling Congress.




Follow
Wired Sources @WiredSources

Rep. Pete King: 'Very suspicious' that FBI is stonewalling on Trump-dossier investigation.

8:03 PM - Oct 25, 2017
Twitter Ads info and privacy


The committees are keen to learn what the informant knows about any Russian efforts to curry favor with Bill and Hillary Clinton, to win Obama administration approval for Moscow’s purchase of large uranium assets in the United States or to secure billions in new contracts uranium sales contracts with American utilities.

“The FBI has informed me that they are releasing my client from his NDA so that he can testify to Congress about his work uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with the Clintons in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration,” Toensing said.

“He is now able and willing to talk with the confessional committees seeking his testimony though I will be working with all parties to ensure his identity remains confidential to ensure his safety,” she added.

* * *

Hillary Clinton is back in the crosshairs of Congressional investigators after two House committees launched investigations into the circumstances surrounding the Obama-era Uranium One deal more than a year after suspicions of a quid-pro-quo were first raised by Peter Schweizer in his infamous “Clinton Cash” expose.

The Hill breathed new life into those allegations last week when it reported on an FBI investigation into attempts by Russian nuclear industry officials at the US-based subsidiary of Rosatom (the Russian nuclear agency) to bribe and extort their way into control of Canada-based Uranium One - and by extension, the 20% of US uranium assets it controls.



And now that the Uranium One story has found its way back into mainstream consciousness, Chuck Grassley, the widely respected head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is calling for the DOJ to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the deal. The thinking is, presumably, if Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein felt comfortable appointing a prosecutor to dig into possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, he should be equally comfortable appointing a prosecutor to investigate these serious allegations from the Obama era. "Whoever in DOJ is capable" of launching an investigation into Uranium One should go ahead and do so, Grassley tweeted.


Whoever in DOJ is capable w authority to appoint a special counsel shld do so to investigate Uranium One "whoever" means if u aren't recused

9:33 PM - Oct 24, 2017



Earlier this month, Grassley’s committee became the first to launch a probe into the Uranium One deal. Last night, it was joined by two House committees after House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said House Intel and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committees would be seeking to learn whether there was in fact an official FBI investigation into the Uranium One deal, and if so, why Congress wasn’t informed.



In addition, the chairmen of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees yesterday announced a joint investigation into the FBI’s handling of a probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server after emails showed earlier this month that former FBI Director James Comey drafted a letter exonerating Clinton before the investigation had been officially completed.

Looking ahead, we wonder if Grassley will be joined by Dianne Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on Grassley's committee who has previously expressed support for an investigation into Clinton’s campaign-era conduct (specifically whether the Clinton’s improperly colluded with former AG Loretta Lynch) or perhaps some other Democrat.
 
It's getting pretty darn fun to watch! Right now Rachel Madcow is going on about Wikileaks and the Mercers' super PAC.

WTF?

I suppose it's more fun to keep digging in rather than enjoy the absolute mess. BTW, apparently Killary said today that she is worried that the Republican Party is "imploding."

This is going to be FUN!!!
 
F Rachel Madcow ,she's a typical lunatic liberal !

Hitlary was on CSPAN yesterday blaming FOX and repubs about the latest revelations of her sleazy doings ,and not once did she mention it was the NYT and WP who broke the story.

She's afraid to call out NYT and WP liars because they will come after her ,so she plays the same old ball game of blaming Fox and Repubs .

LOCK HER UP :D
 
. BTW, apparently Killary said today that she is worried that the Republican Party is "imploding."

This is going to be FUN!!!

Yeh well, Hillary sorta feels like she is all set because the Federal Bureau of Matters has allegedly looked into all this but we obviously are going to go a few more rounds.

Heh, democratic party has the lowest number of elected officials in office in the country since the Civil War as a result of Killary's and the DNC's "leadership" but she is allegedly worried about the republican party imploding? What's wrong with that picture class?
 
The Rats are all scurrying and starting to cover their asses...

---------------------------------------------------------------

Democrats Abandon Hillary: 'New' & 'Old' DNC Deny Knowledge Of Trump Dossier Funding



Last night it was Tom Perez and the 'new' Democratic National Committee that disavowed all knowledge of how the infamous 'Trump Dossier' was funded by the Clinton Campaign. Tonight it is none other than Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the 'old' DNC that has abandoned Hillary.



As The Hill reports, current and past leaders of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) say they had no knowledge that the national party was helping to fund a dossier compiled by a British spy that contained scandalous accusations about President Trump.

Last night, current DNC communications director Xochitl Hinojosa said chairman Tom Perez, who only became the Democratic leader in April, had nothing to do with the arrangement.



"Tom Perez and the new leadership of the DNC were not involved in any decision-making regarding Fusion-GPS, nor were they aware that Perkins Coie was working with the organization."

And now tonight, the avalanche is beginning...

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the DNC’s deputy chairman, emphasized that both he and Perez came to the DNC long after the contract with Fusion GPS had ended.



“Tom and me, we weren’t even there at the time,” Ellison told The Hill.



“I know as much about it as you guys who have reported it.”

A spokesperson for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (R-Fla.), who was forced out as DNC chairwoman at the party’s national convention in 2016, also denied knowing about the arrangement.



“She was not aware of anything related to this research arrangement,” spokesman David Damron said.

Democratic officials said that the national party was not empowered to make campaign decisions, particularly at a time when it was racked by controversy over leaked emails and while its chairwoman was being forced out.



“I doubt that any of the leadership at the DNC was even aware,” a Democratic official said.

The denials are likely to increase focus on the Clinton campaign.
 
DMh98eoVAAA8a52.jpg
 
the really big story here is that these uranium one crimes make the dossier stuff look like bean bag.
 
Last edited:
It's Trump's/sessions DOJ, who cares about witch hunts?

Frankly I'm just glad the DOJ is doing something after all those years of an impotent DOJ under Holder. Remind me how many individuals from banks went to jail for 2008 and the housing bubble, fraudulent lending, etc?
 
Back
Top