Doesn’t Clinton Embarrass Democrats?

I'm still waiting, patiently, for a truthful statement from you about pretty much anything. What are the odds?

http://www.snopes.com/politics/politicians/warren.asp

My statement was factual and the snopes entry basically concedes that. The only quibble is whether her bogus indian claim was a factor in getting the job. Duhhhh...........seriously?

CtaUlfDUkAAnmPV.jpg:large
 
What we do know is the outcome of a Clinton presidency. More corruption. More scandal. A government in total gridlock.
No corruption. Fabricated scandal. What we do know is that Clinton can work on both sides of the aisle and that Trump has a hissy fit whenever anyone even looks at him the wrong way. You really think his hypothetical presidency would be one of meaningful cooperation for the benefit of anyone but himself? His first executive order would be for his name to be a larger font on his official stationary.

Granted Trump is an unknown and I imagine there will be pain. More often than not real change requires some pain.

Like, say, breaking a femur? That kind of painful change? Yeah, that would be Trump change. (Rhymes with chump change.)
 
Last edited:
I'm guessing you did not fully read the summary at Snopes... and just selectively pursued the few lines that fit your preconceived viewpoint.
I'm guessing that you missed the part that makes the whole thing a non-issue. And the part that you guys find contentious? Nonexistent.

I'm sure it was an honest mistake. Just like the countless others.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top