Quote from nkhoi:
good discussion, Lamon, here is a revived chart from db pic at bottom of page http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=33766&perpage=6&pagenumber=6
the arrow is where signal generate and I am just at coarse level (level 1). Since DB was way ahead I guess Jack was criticized from fine level stand point.
Whether or not a "signal" is "generated" depends on the trader, what he's looking for and at, and how aggressive he is. Your arrow is the most aggressive entry: there's a potential selling climax and a buystop can be placed above those bars in the crook of the swing. Or one can buy at the first higher low. Or the second. Or one of the breakouts above one of the swing points. Unless one waits to buy the top, each entry carries slightly less risk but also provides slightly less profit.
I know Db got tired of trying to explain "volume" to people who used it as an indicator rather than as a record of transactions and eventually started using "trading activity" instead in order to get people to think of the relationship between effort and result rather than of what they viewed as indicator-driven movement. Once one understands this relationship, the question posed by this thread -- and most other common questions about "volume" -- become moot.
LC
