By your logic, you are accepting the color difference as the principal distinction between the two bikes, which is what I already noted in my earlier post. For you to take issue with my observation and support peil's opinion is to imply that blue is a "girl's color." How about a big "LOL" to complete your self portrait of buffoonery.Quote from phenomena:
Blue & white = almost identical???Almost as fucked up as the rest of Gabby's logic...
Quote from Gabfly1:
By your logic, you are accepting the color difference as the principal distinction between the two bikes, which is what I already noted in my earlier post. For you to take issue with my observation and support peil's opinion is to imply that blue is a "girl's color." How about a big "LOL" to complete your self portrait of buffoonery.
My original remark was in response to peil characterizing Obama's bike as a girl's bike. Since the only visible difference is one of color, the only conclusion to draw is that peil thinks a blue bike is a girl's bike. For you to take issue with my comment about color not being a meaningful difference is to agree with peil. And the conclusion to be drawn from this final observation is that you're both blithering idiots.Quote from phenomena:
I never supported anything or any opinion. I never said that any color belonged to one gender or another, you just made that up. It's no suprise that you'd make a non sequitur like that with your logic however. ROFL!!!
LOL!!! The guy who can't tell the blue bike apart from the white one wants to offer a logical critisim!!! LOL!! Too funny!!
Quote from Gabfly1:
My original remark was in response to peil characterizing Obama's bike as a girl's bike. Since the only visible difference is one of color, the only conclusiuon to draw is that peil thinks a blue bike is a girl's bike. For you to take issue with my comment about color not being a meaningful difference is to agree with peil. And the conclusion to be draw from this final observation is that you're both blithering idiots.