Yea. Me too, I use
50*ES - 1000*UB
and also
100*ES - 20*NQ
to gauge ES momentum.
Why 50ES - 1000UB vs 5ES - 100UB ?
ES / NQ is interesting but I find NQ to be too volatile to be “relevant” ...
Yea. Me too, I use
50*ES - 1000*UB
and also
100*ES - 20*NQ
to gauge ES momentum.
That's the same relationship, but the cash value of the spread is ten times that amount.Why 50ES - 1000UB vs 5ES - 100UB ?
ES / NQ is interesting but I find NQ to be too volatile to be “relevant” ...
That's the same relationship, but the cash value of the spread is ten times that amount.
It makes the math easy.
ES/NQ in that ratio, (two lots ES vs one lot NQ) I use because it can smooth out index moves. ES is much more liquid and so it leads sometimes.
This is a chart of YM/ES today. Short covering after sustained down move lasting days. It's got a small range but they trade it for size. Pretty sure cash market, futures, and return swaps. I think most of it is the the delta one desks hedging client exposure.
View attachment 231011
It depends. This spread is not very balanced.Does 5ES vs 4NQ is a good ratio ?
Look up the ratios here. (the higher the credit the less risk, generally)Do margins are good proxies for ratio ?
I like outrights, but the front month index spreads are nice.
They can be easier to figure out since there is so much less noise in the action.
An index spread is not a direct hedge for fixed income exposure (outright index futures are), so there will be less participants who are willing and able to affect price.
It can make for obvious moves. Especially when they try to take advantage of the NYSE opening vol. The only problem for retail is capitalization, smart analysis, and after hours liquidity issues.
The most common spreads
Large Cap / Small Cap (10*YM - 150*RTY)
Growth / Value (40*NQ - 15*YM)
Cyclicals (20*NQ - 100*RTY)
Hedged Tech (20*NQ - 50*ES)
Hedged Value (5*YM - 50*ES)
These are all weighted with the CME hedge ratios and the formulas give the cash value of the spread contracts. They can also be combined.
Hedge funds love this shit. They also trade ETF and sector spreads. They can put huge size on this type of trade. It's great for swing trading.
It depends. This spread is not very balanced.
Look up the ratios here. (the higher the credit the less risk, generally)
https://www.cmegroup.com/clearing/margins/inters.html#pageNumber=1
There are many ways to trade these with different ratios.
ES - SPX is an index basis spread. It's used by scalpers and day traders.What about the relationship btw ES and $SPX ?
I am going to check it out today.
Guess it's a crowded trade.
Thanks for your feedbacks.ES - SPX is an index basis spread. It's used by scalpers and day traders.
It's complicated, but there is a pricing model for the future based on the differential of funding rates associated with holding either instrument.
A bank (or HFT market maker) can liquidate a cash t-bill (pay the risk free rate), finance the purchase of equity securities, sell futures, and then either hold stock or loan it at the borrow rate.
This is called cash-and-carry. Reverse cash-and-carry is the opposite (buy futures, sell stock, pay borrow, receive risk free).
There's also a dividend to worry about.
This means that the futures are bought or sold against the (executable) net return expectation in both directions.
This is an arbitrage transaction for HFT market makers in the event of aggressive trading on globex. In other words, when the PREM (futures premium) trades outside a no-arbitrage range (as described above) HFT will execute this transaction and obtain a risk free profit.
(futures can drive the market up or down)
This provides liquidity to globex and facilitates volume-at-price.
(banks are taking advantage of this - they're pushing the market around)
These moments (when the basis spread widens) can offer important insight to traders who are trying to gauge demand for the hedging instrument against pricing on listed markets.
Also, execution desks serving institutional traders have algos that model market impact for execution and so the basis is involved in their willingness to execute orders (vol hedging, institutional rebalancing, order flow, etc.)
)