I don't use TA, I trade on a purely mathematical base using calculus of probabilities.
So your argument doesn't even concern my trading. The advantage of what I do is that 1+1 ALWAYS equals 2. You can never make a story that it is another value.
In past I wrote that I use TA because I mistakenly assumed that what I do is part of TA. But because some reasons I misinterpreted the meaning of the word TA:
- My native language is not english, even my second language isn't.
- I never studied classically used things for trading.
- I never learned what S/r, MA, GANN, RSI, MACD.... are because I am not interested in it. It has been proven over and over again that this will never lead to real succes.
I don't believe in all the BS you find everywhere on the internet and did not want to polute my thinking with it. Now I am glad I took that road. I am open for things that others will never try because their subconscious prevents then to do so. Their subconscious tells them to use the BS they read. Studying this BS learned the brain to think about a number of things in a certain way. But that training will lead your brain in future always automatically to this same methode, maybe without you noticing it. But this means that it blocks a lot of new and original ways of thinking. I don't have that problem. That explains also for some part why I have so many bashers here. They think in the past. Statements like: there was never somebody in past who could..., or: you pretend to be able to do things nobody ever did..., or: I know nobody who....
I read a lot about how brain works and why it does what it does. A lot more useful than reading books about trading.
