Reply to Optioncoach:
The size of the spread depends on the liquidaty of the options. Orders placed as spreads tend to get very close to between bid and ask (i.e. for the legs that have a middle increment between bid and ask*)
IB is totally entitled to have leverage restrictions, and for a system-wide basis it is understandable; the issues were as I mentioned (e.g. the lack of providing of the information that would have put us on guard, the liquidation at sub net-liquidation value, and of the options that fed the problem instead of corrected the problem)
* BTW, additional time to liquidate/ close-out a position, would be of
tremendous benefit to the customer, as he can wait till there IS an
increment between the bid and ask on as many legs as possible, and get a
fill at fair prices. The savings can add up to mega-times the cost of
commissions for the trade.
The size of the spread depends on the liquidaty of the options. Orders placed as spreads tend to get very close to between bid and ask (i.e. for the legs that have a middle increment between bid and ask*)
IB is totally entitled to have leverage restrictions, and for a system-wide basis it is understandable; the issues were as I mentioned (e.g. the lack of providing of the information that would have put us on guard, the liquidation at sub net-liquidation value, and of the options that fed the problem instead of corrected the problem)
* BTW, additional time to liquidate/ close-out a position, would be of
tremendous benefit to the customer, as he can wait till there IS an
increment between the bid and ask on as many legs as possible, and get a
fill at fair prices. The savings can add up to mega-times the cost of
commissions for the trade.