Does Elliott Wave Theory actually work?

If one can't do it, it doesn't mean nobody can. How many of you read Chinese?

You can translate Chinese to any language on earth.
And then, you can translate it back.
And you can do this again and again and again.
And aside from some "slippage" of vocabulary or tenses and such, the same story will be repeatedly told.

So you see the problem with your analogy?
You can't do that (translate back and forth, expecting same/similar outcomes)
with Mr. Elliot's waves.
You can't *predict*, but only *diagnose* on dead, already-happened, data:
"post mortem."

To put it *very* simply: to have predictive utility, a method must first be, predictive.
 
A lot of talks about this old-new method. Is this stuff actually work? Has anyone tried it yet? What books would you recommend to find more specific about this stuff. Thanks.

The title of the thread is correct: it is a theory..., not a trading method and that applies to any type of market analysis.

One has to create the trading method oneself ! And while doing that, one may utilize the theory (including Eliot's) to the extend that one thinks is useful.

Looking for the books explaining the working method someone created based on Eliot ways (or any analysis) - good luck with that.
 
You can translate Chinese to any language on earth.
And then, you can translate it back.
And you can do this again and again and again.
And aside from some "slippage" of vocabulary or tenses and such, the same story will be repeatedly told.

So you see the problem with your analogy?
You can't do that (translate back and forth, expecting same/similar outcomes)
with Mr. Elliot's waves.
You can't *predict*, but only *diagnose* on dead, already-happened, data:
"post mortem."

To put it *very* simply: to have predictive utility, a method must first be, predictive.

Isn’t one the telling of a story in the past and the other more of a telling of an unfolding story in the present?

The present always contains multiple possibilities of what the future might bring.

Meteorologists appear to forecast based on trends of what is happening in the present extending into the future. Meteorologists frequently get it wrong but does it discount the method’s utility?
 
You can translate Chinese to any language on earth.
And then, you can translate it back.
And you can do this again and again and again.
And aside from some "slippage" of vocabulary or tenses and such, the same story will be repeatedly told.

So you see the problem with your analogy?
You can't do that (translate back and forth, expecting same/similar outcomes)
with Mr. Elliot's waves.
You can't *predict*, but only *diagnose* on dead, already-happened, data:
"post mortem."

To put it *very* simply: to have predictive utility, a method must first be, predictive.
You missed my point: "If one (you) can't do it (i.e. speak Chinese, trade profitably), it doesn't mean nobody can (speak Chinese, trade profitably)".

We all look at the same data (Chinese characters, price data), but we can't see what others see, even when we're given hints. If you can't do it, it doesn't mean others can't do it. But, be sure that if you think it can't be done, you won't be able to do it. Keep an open mind!
 
The whole idea isn't to predict, but to look at what happened until this moment, to analyze it, gauge the market breath at the moment, and act accordingly. Then don't get stuck with your past assessments; just keep reassessing and acting accordingly.

Elliott Wave Theory, and others help you make that assessment. They give you an edge if you understand what they are (including their limitations), and what they tell you.
 
The whole idea isn't to predict, but to look at what happened until this moment, to analyze it, gauge the market breath at the moment, and act accordingly. Then don't get stuck with your past assessments; just keep reassessing and acting accordingly.

Elliott Wave Theory, and others help you make that assessment. They give you an edge if you understand what they are (including their limitations), and what they tell you.

Elliot's method is interpolation; prediction depends on extrapolation.
 
Elliot's method is interpolation; prediction depends on extrapolation.

Elliot's Wave Theory works for Elliot. -- you should develop your own theory, and call it McGinnis' Theory.
Too many people look directly at someone else for their instant overnight gold mine market success riches, :confused:

Make Trading Great Again 2018, High-Five`
 
Elliot's Wave Theory works for Elliot. -- you should develop your own theory, and call it McGinnis' Theory.
Too many people look directly at someone else for their instant overnight gold mine market success riches, :confused:

Make Trading Great Again 2018, High-Five`
Those patterns and theories are all sooo yesterday.
Anybody that knows anything is trading the ATS-320XXX.
300% annually with no losses.

tanti.jpg

s-l640.jpg

Felonious Gru... the talking genius
He even has a "Try Me" button.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top