its fucking data moron from the best data set we have...
... read it... understand it.
and its common sense... you moron.
The vaccines rely on our immune systems idiot...
Of course there would be a strong chance our immune system would be better than the vaccines which stimulate the immune systems.
Its basic science... mRNA tech is new... may years down the road they could stimulate the natural immune system perfectly... but as of now they did a good job... but not as good as nature.
---
Finally moron.. although the results overwhelm these issues...
there is the issue of selection... and other biases...
You have read this no where but from my genius mind.
T
a. Those with really bad immune systems who got hit with the virus are dead.
b. And some of those future dead wind up in the vaccinated group (but had been protected by luck or personal vigilance so of course that group will hurt the vaxxed group)
c. The vaxxed group also gets to the benefit of those with strong immune systems who wer not going to get hurt by any of these biases so far.)
Therefore unless we are comparing control group to vax group... for instance high risk vs low risk... vaxxed and naive- previously infected never infected
most of the data we see is not that useful for determining efficacy.
... read it... understand it.
and its common sense... you moron.
The vaccines rely on our immune systems idiot...
Of course there would be a strong chance our immune system would be better than the vaccines which stimulate the immune systems.
Its basic science... mRNA tech is new... may years down the road they could stimulate the natural immune system perfectly... but as of now they did a good job... but not as good as nature.
---
Finally moron.. although the results overwhelm these issues...
there is the issue of selection... and other biases...
You have read this no where but from my genius mind.
T
a. Those with really bad immune systems who got hit with the virus are dead.
b. And some of those future dead wind up in the vaccinated group (but had been protected by luck or personal vigilance so of course that group will hurt the vaxxed group)
c. The vaxxed group also gets to the benefit of those with strong immune systems who wer not going to get hurt by any of these biases so far.)
Therefore unless we are comparing control group to vax group... for instance high risk vs low risk... vaxxed and naive- previously infected never infected
most of the data we see is not that useful for determining efficacy.
Once again you are pushing a non-peer reviewed pre-print study while actually attempting to push a false narrative from the study's results -- which actually states that people who had Covid need one dose of the vaccine for best protection.
