Doaks Challenges Hershey

Quote from Albert Cibiades:

Quote from jack hershey:

This is NOT saying that any probability maths is used EVER.
QUOTE]
Is that the same as saying "Probability maths is used NOT ever?" Does your mouth represent your mind? You operate on binary decision theory, short or long. I operate on ternary decision theory, short or long or flat. In either case, the thresholding you use to make those decisions is definenitely probabilistic, if not probaballistic. If I didn't disagree, I agreed.[/
More...

I wsn't able to construct a good sentence.

There are lots of binary possibilities. I do not use a chosen set and view it as a set of possibilities. If you have two possibilities and one is happening then the other is NOT happening.

You think I am using one combo and, in fact, I do not use that combo. I use two gerunds and they are NOT opposites.

One gerund is continuing the other is changing. Continuing is a sustained state and changing is a brief category that has it own world of happenings that are events that come and go in a moment.

I do not use a decision theory per se. What I am trying to point out is that there are two parallel systems: one for Monitoring and Analysis and another for placing and handling trading.

I have suggested that there is a system for handling the operation of the market and there is another system for making money at a very high velocity.

Using a lot of capital makes the trading different than what people talk about in ET.

In this forum composed of many threads there is a thread by a person who is using a very imperfect strategy system design process. He gets from garbage in .....garbage out. He is perfoming so far below the market's offer a comparison the market's offer yields that he is statisitically insignificant. He publishes and sells information for a living.

Periodically, I try to discuss trading with others using a referent context. I guess on a Venn diagram it would be like drawing a region where a set of common understandings could be iteratively refined into a whole.

Here in this thread I mentioned how information could be created and then used to complete essential tasks for completing monitoring and analysis. Infomation is also created for using the results of analysis to do decion making and then taking timely actions.

All of these to parts are very different from the OODA that you use. Betting and appraising bets is never going to be cpable of taking the market's full offer.

By examining how the market works, it is possible to conclude that predicting is NOT necessary. Neither is spending time trying to learn how to set stops, when a system of stops doe not work if a person is a significant player in the markets.

Is there any common ground?
More...
 
Quote from Albert Cibiades:

All that for little old me? Of course not. I know that. I am merely a noisily and noisomely vocal CWer. Glad to give you an excuse.

And I know that you will be disappointed if I don't point out that your supposed DOF's in OHLC are aggregated from "last" on the tape. And "volume" is aggregated from "size" on the tape, as"consistent duration" is derived from time last and size.. All created for people too stupid or lazy or inattentive to watch a fast price display like one second. The superlatives of the above pejorative adjectives dwell on five minute. My trading, such as it is, is all about purity of presentation. Attached is the kind of purity I seek. Admittedly one second is still aggregated, but I am unable to process anything faster. At my advanced age. And I don't need any longer chart duration. I can't remember that far back.
More...

The top superlative of my duration...

"OHLC are aggregated from "last" on the tape. And "volume" is aggregated from "size" on the tape, as"consistent duration" is derived from time last and size.. All created for people too stupid or lazy or inattentive to watch a fast price display like one second.

perfect.
 
Quote from jem:

The top superlative of my duration...

"OHLC are aggregated from "last" on the tape. And "volume" is aggregated from "size" on the tape, as"consistent duration" is derived from time last and size.. All created for people too stupid or lazy or inattentive to watch a fast price display like one second.

perfect. [/QUOT

Thanks. But je m'en doute that Jack thinks it is parfait.
More...
 
Quote from jack hershey:

i rescheduled with CNBC four times and then I cancelled.

The TV environment is really an entertainment venue.

The Jim cramer show is based on his success in CW and he can do quick views of anything by just using his approach.

Public personalities usually come from having a lot of OPM in their history.

How I relate is as a retailer who has been around for longer than most ever will be.

It may be possible to communicate the system I use but so far, I find most people have worked to develop beliefs that are oriented to CW and CW has no yield compared to the market's offer. For them they believe that there is a safety in numbers nd the cluster is always going to be there.
More...

I degree. CNBC would not do you injustice. As you may or may not recall, some years ago ET's own unproved shrink Dr. Duref Mudgins offered to unterview you. He tells me the orifer is still bad. Whut saie ye? The ruels demain the same. No bullshit. Par exemple, we cannot call a Girlie Scouts pamplet a book.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

I wsn't able to construct a good sentence.

There are lots of binary possibilities. I do not use a chosen set and view it as a set of possibilities. If you have two possibilities and one is happening then the other is NOT happening.

You think I am using one combo and, in fact, I do not use that combo. I use two gerunds and they are NOT opposites.

One gerund is continuing the other is changing. Continuing is a sustained state and changing is a brief category that has it own world of happenings that are events that come and go in a moment.

I do not use a decision theory per se. What I am trying to point out is that there are two parallel systems: one for Monitoring and Analysis and another for placing and handling trading.

I have suggested that there is a system for handling the operation of the market and there is another system for making money at a very high velocity.

Using a lot of capital makes the trading different than what people talk about in ET.

In this forum composed of many threads there is a thread by a person who is using a very imperfect strategy system design process. He gets from garbage in .....garbage out. He is perfoming so far below the market's offer a comparison the market's offer yields that he is statisitically insignificant. He publishes and sells information for a living.

Periodically, I try to discuss trading with others using a referent context. I guess on a Venn diagram it would be like drawing a region where a set of common understandings could be iteratively refined into a whole.

Here in this thread I mentioned how information could be created and then used to complete essential tasks for completing monitoring and analysis. Infomation is also created for using the results of analysis to do decion making and then taking timely actions.

All of these to parts are very different from the OODA that you use. Betting and appraising bets is never going to be cpable of taking the market's full offer.

By examining how the market works, it is possible to conclude that predicting is NOT necessary. Neither is spending time trying to learn how to set stops, when a system of stops doe not work if a person is a significant player in the markets.

Is there any common ground?
More...

I am so dead fucking drunk that this poast made imperfect bad sense. Whut to say? I think thst you may have read Stanford Goldman's "Information Theory" in your wasted youth, as I did. All of my codes are based on it, as I could not progress to Schwartz, given my descent into ivresse. But somehowe ye missed the concept of a tested indecison threshold.

I go back and forth on you. Am I totally stupid? Or are you incomprehensile? Maybe incompresenile? As to common ground, I think that Liz is delightful, and that she will be lonely when you are gone.

In any event, remember what Scarlett O'Hara said about the morrow.
 
Quote from Albert Cibiades:

I am so dead fucking drunk that this poast made imperfect bad sense. Whut to say? I think thst you may have read Stanford Goldman's "Information Theory" in your wasted youth, as I did. All of my codes are based on it, as I could not progress to Schwartz, given my descent into ivresse. But somehowe ye missed the concept of a tested indecison threshold.

I go back and forth on you. Am I totally stupid? Or are you incomprehensile? Maybe incompresenile? As to common ground, I think that Liz is delightful, and that she will be lonely when you are gone.

In any event, remember what Scarlett O'Hara said about the morrow.
More...

Hey Hypo, you have to take it easy with the stuff you are swallowing. I know it isn't easy to read all of the gibberish Jack's ass spits out, but you have to try.
Our poor old Jack won't make any "calls" otherwise. Let the old fart embarress himself. Please.

The Foole doth thinke he is wise, but the wiseman knowes himselfe to be a Foole.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top