No, those two values are not unimaginable.
We are at the end of the TNX cycle, now its time for the TNX to rise after finishing its run up from the 1960s to its top in the 1980s to its low point in the 2000s.
To believe that the S&P will simply keep rising thinking that these companies will keep growing is unrealistic. On Oct 1st of 1965, the S&P closed at 92.43. On April 1st of 1975, the S&P closed at 95.00. On April 1st, 1982, the S&P closed at 109. Thats 18% appreciation of the index in 17 years. Wasnt the world growing from the 60s to the 80s?
Its not inconcievable to believe that these indexes will turn right around and make a double bottom to the levels they were at a few years ago.
While some may laugh at this assertion, one has to ask themselves did the guys who traded during the mid 60s ever conceive that the S&P500 would have only returned 18% in 17 years?
We are at the end of the TNX cycle, now its time for the TNX to rise after finishing its run up from the 1960s to its top in the 1980s to its low point in the 2000s.
To believe that the S&P will simply keep rising thinking that these companies will keep growing is unrealistic. On Oct 1st of 1965, the S&P closed at 92.43. On April 1st of 1975, the S&P closed at 95.00. On April 1st, 1982, the S&P closed at 109. Thats 18% appreciation of the index in 17 years. Wasnt the world growing from the 60s to the 80s?
Its not inconcievable to believe that these indexes will turn right around and make a double bottom to the levels they were at a few years ago.
While some may laugh at this assertion, one has to ask themselves did the guys who traded during the mid 60s ever conceive that the S&P500 would have only returned 18% in 17 years?
Quote from JSL_Capital:
My thoughts on equity using Bill Gross's GDP extrapolation and my required rate of return.
If Bill Gross's assessment that the GDP growth tends to revert to the mean of about 5% and I want to get at least 8% return on mature cyclical stocks the fair value of the Dow is, using the dividend discount model:
247.96 * 1.05 / (8% - 5%) = 8678.6
And the fair value of the S&P 500 using the same model:
819
Yikes!
Now, I'm not saying that the market needs to go to such levels in any way, but the model is just telling me, if I want 8% annualized return over the period of say, the next 10 years as a buy and hold investor, buying these indices at those levels will make sense. Right now the required rate of return for the big funds seems to be in the 7% range, far lower than the past 20 years (with the exception of the late 90s).