Quote from cabletrader:
I think this thread has gone way beyond losing direction, it's totally out there!
(You could be right about that being the expiration date, I don't feel very well this morning
Oh well, I guess I'll use the rest to clean the green stuff off the patio....)
Forex is a risk transaction between counterparties. Your A sells to B and B sell to C, etc. and all profit at the end can be true only in the case of stocks, when A issues stock through an IPO. Even in that case, when these transactions are viewed relative to benchmark returns, they are zero-sum (commissions not accounted for).
It is also troublesome that in an effort to provide support for your argument you invoke infinities. Yes, in an infinity hotel, everybody can get a room even if every room is full (Hilbert's paradox). But in the real finite world, the total combined GDP is something in the order of maybe 50 trillion USD and given that on a daily basis, more than 2 trillion USD trade in forex, it is implied gloriously that the game is zero-sum, otherwise the game would increase the GDP by a sizable factor every year.
Given the fact that world GDP is unaffected from a forex game that in every 25 or so days, the same amount is traded, this is another proof for you that forex is a zero-sum game. On the contrary, stock IOPs increase GDP in specific cases involving productivity growth.
By calling an argument academic you are not in any way undermine its significance or truth. There is a wide consensus in he financial world that forex is a zero-sum game. You have not provided proof for it being otherwise, except for your call to infinite money and traders, which is of course false, no such thing exists.