Quote from deltatrade:
so what is known to be ta does not work in as they are presented. useless. out of 500 trading ideas only 3-4 work. discretionary trading is gut trading and it is not science.
but the ideas that work in a systematic way on normal charts work the same on random charts .
my theory is that the markets are random and behave exactly like the random ones provided that they are chandlesticks.
if i were to demonstrate this what would be the testing parameters?
My view is that the markets closely relate to their participants.
Thus, I could build a system of the market's operation.
So I did several of these.
Now, looking back I conclude several things.
Prediction is not a necessity for taking the full offer of the markets.
There is no need to apply statistics to the markets to take the full offer of the market.
Market participation rules and the rights of participants are all that are needed to create markets. Market behavior comes from this.
Iterative refinement of methods is complete when noise, flaws and anomalies are not longer a part of the data stream processing.
The thread is about patterns in random walks. If a random walk in a market rules of operation setting is done; then there will be patterns. The reason and basis of my certain conclusion is the simple fact that the variables of markets are granular.
I have been around. In fact, I am recognized in academics, research, applied science and engineering.
My most exciting advanced learning experience was in theoretical physics. I was fortunate enough to have P. Gabrial Bergman in front of the white board for several top of the line classes. He used Russian texts mostly.(the famous L's)