The "larger players" are, as you put it, "excessively risk averse" because they know the market a lot better than you do (they've got access to better data than you do, they've got teams of staff with more combined experience than you do). They know the realities of the market and they know exactly how much risk they can take without being stupid.
.
That's a thing, as mentioned by Lovethetrade above, retail/private investors don't need to avoid at all cost or be fired a drawdown of 20/30/40% and they can use riskier strategies , although it's most probably a road with far more tragedies than successes.
Lower risks/less volatile strategies make a lot of sense, but if one has enough capital or a significant extra source of income.
Last edited:
