Do you agree with the Republicans suggestion Of invading Iran

Quote from ratboy88:

how stupid do you guys think we are???
Huh? I think you're very stupid but what does your stupidity have to do with Iran's unwavering determination to pursue nuclear weapons? They've been playing diplomatic games with Europeans for a few years now, they'll keep doing it even if the US decides to negotiate with them, does not matter directly or multilaterally.

Quote from ratboy88:

i would love to watch this idiot ROLL into iran
That btw is not on the agenda. What part of "bombing not invading" do you not understand?
 
Quote from dddooo:

Since the beginning of times Hapa, since Adam negotiated with God to get himself a girlfriend.
Imbecilic statement, dddooo.

"Diplomatic solution" does not automatically mean "direct talks."

Get it?

LOL and what a wonderful and profound success it has been, NK is building nukes and we're still waiting for those mulit-party negotiations to commence. Next time try to come up with a better example - maybe Bush's direct negotiations with Lybia which were indeed a success, maybe Reagan's direct talks with Gorbachev, Nixon's trip to China. Maybe Israel's direct negotiations with Egypt and Jordan which were huge breakthroughs and even with Arafat which almost succeeded, maybe India's direct negotiations with Pakistan....
Whether or not you agree with the means by which the US is approaching the North Korean situation is meaningless. The fact remains that "diplomatic solution" does not inherently involve "direct talks."

Get it?

Again, please enroll in Diplomacy 101 and leave your sanctimonious remarks at the entryway.

PS For the record I personally don't believe that a diplomatic solution will work but your dear leader seems to think so.
"Dear leader"? Oh dddooo, you're such a dissappointment nowadays. You used to be able to come up with the occasional good point, and now you resort to saying that anyone who disagrees with you on an issue automatically loves the President.

What happened to you?
 
Quote from hapaboy:

"Diplomatic solution" does not automatically mean "direct talks."
Please give me an example of a successful diplomatic solution that did not involve direct talks so that I could better understand what you, Charles Krauthammer and George W Bush have in mind.

btw I am afraid you're confusing direct talks with bilateral talks, this administration is not willing to be involved in any kind (bilateral or multilateral) of negotiations with Iran.
 
Quote from dddooo:

Please give me an example of a successful diplomatic solution that did not involve direct talks so that I could better understand what you, Charles Krauthammer and George W Bush have in mind.

btw I am afraid you're confusing direct talks with bilateral talks, this administration is not willing to be involved in any kind (bilateral or multilateral) of negotiations with Iran.
Please show me where the definition of "diplomatic solution" is "direct talks."

I am not confused about this issue at all. You are the one who has it fixed in your head that "diplomatic solution" automatically means direct talks.
 
Back
Top