Quote from John Merchant:
Savvy. My point was that I don't trade anything I can't test.
Quote from makosgu:
OK GROB, I am asking for some clarification please... I saw M0z's post but had some differences as to the items he ID'd as low risk. Nothing in this post is a response. No facial expressions or head gestures either.
Makosgu, I was hoping you would share what you saw differently on my list. It was an initial start and I have changed it a little since then, and I still have more to go. I'm trying to not get ahead of myself filling in the list, sometimes things I think of are really only wishful thinking for things I don't really "know" yet. Here is my current list
Jack's 'spouses' don't need to be tested. NLP guarantees success.Quote from John Merchant:
Savvy. Thank you for your kind offer, but I have tried many times to understand other people's complicated systems and I never seem to be able to get it. My best system, which I never talk about, has only two rules. The seven rule one is a little oil/NQ tick fuck I described elsewhere. It is so complex that it might as well be intuitive. I often find when I dialogue with people about their systems that they have far more rules than they realize. Which I why I love ragging on Jack. He is impossible to pin down because he doesn't want anything he espouses to be tested. Mike.
Quote from John Merchant:
Savvy. Thank you for your kind offer, but I have tried many times to understand other people's complicated systems and I never seem to be able to get it. My best system, which I never talk about, has only two rules. The seven rule one is a little oil/NQ tick fuck I described elsewhere. It is so complex that it might as well be intuitive. I often find when I dialogue with people about their systems that they have far more rules than they realize. Which I why I love ragging on Jack. He is impossible to pin down because he doesn't want anything he espouses to be tested. Mike.