Do real conservatives have the courage to read this book?

Clinton(s) is a criminal as is Bush. Why the need to defend either side? Looking you`re countrymen in the face and telling them lies is just that. I dont like either of them.

Monday, Dec. 19, 2005 11:45 a.m. EST
Clinton Used NSA for Economic Espionage

During the 1990s, President Bill Clinton ordered the National Security Agency to use its super-secret Echelon surveillance program to monitor the personal telephone calls and private email of employees who worked for foreign companies in a bid to boost U.S. trade, NewsMax.com has learned.

In 2000, former Clinton CIA director James Woolsey set off a firestorm of protest in Europe when he told the French newspaper Le Figaro that he was ordered by Clinton in 1993 to transform Echelon into a tool for gathering economic intelligence.

"We have a triple and limited objective," the former intelligence chief told the French paper. "To look out for companies which are breaking US or UN sanctions; to trace 'dual' technologies, i.e., for civil and military use, and to track corruption in international business."

As NewsMax reported exclusively on Sunday, Echelon had been used by the Clinton administration to monitor millions of personal phone calls, private emails and even ATM transactions inside the U.S. - all without a court order.
 
Quote from sputdr:



If the leaders of the Democratic party weren't so blind and stupid they would have had a better candidate than John Kerry and Howard Dean to challenge Bush and he probably wouldn't have won a second term.

here here. Why does the country reject the possibility of a third party candidate? Because the majors say so??? Change is in the winds.
 
Quote from saxon:

zzz...

What is it with you? The 2004 election is over. Your candidate lost. DEAL WITH IT, already!!

sheesh...

a statement from a very shallow thinker . This guy is a disaster for every American whether you voted for him or not. I'm a lifelong Republican and Bush and Co. are NOT IMO Republicans in any way but name. They are to me worse the Dems at their worst.

DS
 
Quote from dddooo:

Are you saying that Kerry and Gore were worse than Bush who's outsourcing our national security to an arab country? That's on top of the war in Iraq, inability to catch Osama and destroy AQ, Katrina disaster, huge trade/budget deficits etc.

Do you really think that Kerry/Gore would have been worse or you've been brainwashed by the republican smear machine to believe that? Or you're just trying to come up with non-existent excuses of your wrong voting decisions? Nobody could have possibly been worse than Bush and people who failed to recognize it in the voting booth aren't too bright to put it mildly.

There was no way to tell he would have been worse than Gore because Gore lost in 2000.

Kerry may have been better just because congress wouldn't allow him to do anything but Kerry has never done anything in his entire political life so I guess it wouldn't have mattered much. Kerry with democrats in congress would have been just as bad.

What about Clinton's absolute denial of Al Queda and inability to catch osama? Oh wait, Clinton didnt have to catch him, all he had to do was accept him from the Sudan. Maybe he just didn't want to pay the gas money for the plane to get him.
 
Quote from sputdr:

There was no way to tell he would have been worse than Gore because Gore lost in 2000.

Kerry may have been better just because congress wouldn't allow him to do anything but Kerry has never done anything in his entire political life so I guess it wouldn't have mattered much. Kerry with democrats in congress would have been just as bad.

What about Clinton's absolute denial of Al Queda and inability to catch osama? Oh wait, Clinton didnt have to catch him, all he had to do was accept him from the Sudan. Maybe he just didn't want to pay the gas money for the plane to get him.
That's what I was talking about, bogus excuses, historical lies, Kerry's voting record (which I bet you've never seen), Dean's scream (cause his governing record was exceptional) and Clinton to justify voting twice for a person univerally recognized as an ignorant, lazy, stubborn moron. You're not fooling anyone, well...maybe yourself.
 
Quote from dddooo:

That's what I was talking about, bogus excuses, historical lies, Kerry's voting record (which I bet you've never seen), Dean's scream (cause his governing record was exceptional) and Clinton to justify voting twice for a person univerally recognized as an ignorant, lazy, stubborn moron. You're not fooling anyone, well...maybe yourself.

I have seen kerry's voting record- He misses a large percentage of the votes and he's never sponsored any legislation worthy of talking about.

and the biggest reason not to vote for him is that he's from MASS.
 
Back
Top