Quote from edbar:
[
I contend that with TEST1 you will get stopped out 90% of the time. While with TEST2, it will be 50-50.
Ed [/B]
Quote from cunparis:
This should, in theory, be positive.
But what about in real trading? I'm a bit skeptical because it just seems too easy.
Quote from edbar:
TEST1
Buy 100 Shares of MSFT
Place a Limit Order to sell .05 higher
Place a Stop Loss to sell .05 lower
See which one gets taken out first.
TEST2
Next Buy 100 Shares of MSFT
Write down on paper to sell .05 high
Write down on paper to sell .05 lower
Now see which happens first.
Ed [/B]
Quote from Joab:
When all the exact same people, who all have the exact same account size and who are all in the exact same mood are back again tomorrow as they were yesterday, then your back tested strategies should will work perfectly.
That's not much to ask for is it?

"Nowhere does history indulge in repetitions so often or so uniformly as in Wall Street. When you read contemporary accounts of booms or panics the one thing that strikes you most forcibly is how little either stock speculation or stock speculators to-day differ from yesterday. The game does not change and neither does human nature." Reminiscences of a Stock OperatorQuote from cunparis:
"Wall street doesn't change because human nature doesn't change."
Paraphrased from a quote from jesse livermore.![]()
Quote from edbar:
I don't know what brokers have for hiding the limit and stop loss orders. I know my software has it built-in called "stealth mode".
To convince yourself whether your 100 shares of MSFT limit order matters, do this simple test:
TEST1
Buy 100 Shares of MSFT
Place a Limit Order to sell .05 higher
Place a Stop Loss to sell .05 lower
See which one gets taken out first.
TEST2
Next Buy 100 Shares of MSFT
Write down on paper to sell .05 high
Write down on paper to sell .05 lower
Now see which happens first.
I contend that with TEST1 you will get stopped out 90% of the time. While with TEST2, it will be 50-50.
I've already done it, and those are my results.
Ed