Do not attack Syria!!!!!
- Thread starter Tony Stark
- Start date
Our ic and law enforcement cant even tell if clinton did this or trump did that after months and months, but in one day they know for sure who gassed who in Syria. Because some rebels we back(ed), who were fixing to lose their war, say it wasn't them, it was assad. And they wouldn't lie to us, for sure, because that isn't the kind of people we back. No matter that isis and al quaida are part of our 'effort', and torturing and killing people is as normal to them as taking a camel ride down to amed's for supper.
False flags? You guys listen to Alex Jones a wee bit too much. Beginning to think you're as nutty as the leftists. No wonder the country is so fucked up. Nothing but a bunch of whiners pissing and moaning about anything and everything.
I don't listen to Alex Jones at all and think he's a nut. Regardless, I do not believe Assad had anything to do with the latest chemical attack. If he was at all, it was accidental (as in a bombing of a location where rebels had the stuff). The gassing back in 2013, however, that looked to be a saudi funded rebel operation to bring the US into the fray.
We don't know if the chemical attack in Syria was by Assad or a false flag by the rebels to spark intervention (as the rebels have demonstrated in the past they are not above). We know the Neo-Cons/Neo-Libs want Assad gone and were funding the jihadis for regime change. All public knowledge of the attack indicates a false flag - unless Trump is sitting on undeniable evidence that Assad just committed suicide by using gas like a brainlet moron.
HOWEVER - it's irrelevant whether it's true or not in the grand scheme of things. And this is why: If it wasn't a false flag he responded appropriately. All he did was bomb an airfield storing the chemical weapons - targeting aircraft and infrastructure while avoiding personnel - after warning the Russians. No Russian casualties = No WWIII. Currently conflicting reports on SAA casualties - Pentagon says none, SAA says yes one dead. Doesn't matter. By targeting the air base and not Assad's headquarters (like Libya) he demonstrated this had NOTHING to do with regime change. Just sending a message
1. He just put Assad in check while sedating Neo-Cons like McCain, liberals who want Assad gone, and Israel (who are the people who would have supported the false flag). He's winning over support from people stonewalling him with a glorified firework show.
2. He's being tough on China and North Korea. He was meeting with the leader of China today. By pulling the trigger unannounced like this he's showing he's not fucking around with North Korea. No doubt a message to Iran as well.
3. Even if Syrian forces are grounded they still have Russian air support. Essentially nothing has changed strategically speaking.
4. The momentary salt of some of his supporters will fade as the hysteria dies down when it's seen as it is - truly nothing of significance. He gets to keep them too.
5. Another nail in the coffin for the Russian collusion narrative
HOWEVER - it's irrelevant whether it's true or not in the grand scheme of things. And this is why: If it wasn't a false flag he responded appropriately. All he did was bomb an airfield storing the chemical weapons - targeting aircraft and infrastructure while avoiding personnel - after warning the Russians. No Russian casualties = No WWIII. Currently conflicting reports on SAA casualties - Pentagon says none, SAA says yes one dead. Doesn't matter. By targeting the air base and not Assad's headquarters (like Libya) he demonstrated this had NOTHING to do with regime change. Just sending a message
1. He just put Assad in check while sedating Neo-Cons like McCain, liberals who want Assad gone, and Israel (who are the people who would have supported the false flag). He's winning over support from people stonewalling him with a glorified firework show.
2. He's being tough on China and North Korea. He was meeting with the leader of China today. By pulling the trigger unannounced like this he's showing he's not fucking around with North Korea. No doubt a message to Iran as well.
3. Even if Syrian forces are grounded they still have Russian air support. Essentially nothing has changed strategically speaking.
4. The momentary salt of some of his supporters will fade as the hysteria dies down when it's seen as it is - truly nothing of significance. He gets to keep them too.
5. Another nail in the coffin for the Russian collusion narrative
You know those 5 million+ refugees that have come out of Syria that never gets attributed to anybody? (obama)
Well now after those missiles, Trump will own them. Every refugee that comes out of Syria will very soon be Trump's fault if you watch cnn or msnbc. Probably nbc, cbs and abc, too.
Well now after those missiles, Trump will own them. Every refugee that comes out of Syria will very soon be Trump's fault if you watch cnn or msnbc. Probably nbc, cbs and abc, too.
Interesting analysis.
Let's hope some of it is true. For me, to get my monster vote back, this would have to be some delightfully amazing 3D chess. But the only move I would accept is if this was really an attack on an ISIS base, disguised as aircover for Al-Queda, disguised as revenge for Assad atrocites.
Otherwise he can go find himself a new base.
Oh look! I think he found a couple (McCain and his boyfriend).
Oh look! A couple more...Optionpro007, and CaptainObvious.
