Hello,
I created post seeing what people think of Ally Invest. I found a comment so interesting that I though it warranted its own post:
"... OANDA had better spreads than ALLY Invest, whose spreads were often RIDICULOUS!"
I find this amazing. Is it true that, for example, something like this could happen:
Microsoft stock
Schwab: 85.00 bid, 85.40 ask
Ally: 84.90 bid, 85.50 ask
I thought bid/ask was determined by the general community of market makers out there. I had no idea one online brokerage could be offering meaningfully different bid/asks compared to another brokerage. Maybe an obscure stock, but not a popular one like Microsoft.
So if Ally (as a theoretical example) has $2 less per trade, but gives you a $.15 per share worse selling price, then you would be worse off on the sale of 100 shares. You saved $2 in fees, but got $15 less for the shares you sold.
I created post seeing what people think of Ally Invest. I found a comment so interesting that I though it warranted its own post:
"... OANDA had better spreads than ALLY Invest, whose spreads were often RIDICULOUS!"
I find this amazing. Is it true that, for example, something like this could happen:
Microsoft stock
Schwab: 85.00 bid, 85.40 ask
Ally: 84.90 bid, 85.50 ask
I thought bid/ask was determined by the general community of market makers out there. I had no idea one online brokerage could be offering meaningfully different bid/asks compared to another brokerage. Maybe an obscure stock, but not a popular one like Microsoft.
So if Ally (as a theoretical example) has $2 less per trade, but gives you a $.15 per share worse selling price, then you would be worse off on the sale of 100 shares. You saved $2 in fees, but got $15 less for the shares you sold.