Didn't take long for the Clinton crowd to begin lying about the wikileaks being fake and their useful idiots to spread it on places like ET.
http://www.infowars.com/pro-clinton-journalists-spread-false-doctored-wikileaks-email-claim/
Do any Hillary supporters care about what Wikileaks has shown?
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Didn't take long for the Clinton crowd to begin lying about the wikileaks being fake and their useful idiots to spread it on places like ET.
http://www.infowars.com/pro-clinton-journalists-spread-false-doctored-wikileaks-email-claim/
No, they are fabricating a story and leaking it to Drumpf.
Leaked Emails Reveal Hillary Clinton Hates The Phrase ‘Everyday Americans'
It's the phrase, everyday americans, she didn't like, but the emails are genuine. Do you people really think she cares about regular americans? Read up on her other emails and take note of her detachment from the middle class.
I'm still trying to find out how she is qualified to be president.
It's the phrase, everyday americans, she didn't like, but the emails are genuine. Do you people really think she cares about regular americans? Read up on her other emails and take note of her detachment from the middle class.
I'm still trying to find out how she is qualified to be president.
So, vote for Drumpf then?
Yeah, how dare they.
She deleted 33,000 emails after recieving a supena to preserve. That's highly illegal. Destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice.
She disclosed classified, top secret and above top secret info over 1000 times using her bathroom email server. Each offence is a felony.
She and her underlyings had classification warning labels removed from classified intelligence and sent Via insecure server. Those are all felonies. Over 100 counts. The Russians Chinese Iranians and others hacked into her account and stole all our top secret info.
She directly armed Isis and terrorists in Libya and Syria. We have the emails. That's treason. Directly aiding and abetting a declared enemy to the United States.
She stood down on Benghazi. Benghazi was a CIA weapons running operation to Isis. That's why the ambassador was killed. That's easily proveable
She sold influence at the state department. Over 40% of her appointments went to donors. That's highly illegal. Many of her official acts as sec of state rewarded private donors to the Clinton foundation with favourable American rulings, who later gave even more money to the Clinton foundation. That's all highly illegal.
And then you've got the Clinton foundation giving 10 cents of every dollar collected to actual charity. The other 90 cents (usually to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars) went to overhead expenses like "travel" "hotels" and "dinners". This is an obvious bribing operation. Currently under three FBI investigations. I guess that faggott bitch traitor comey won't have anything to say before the election.
Don't worry. That bitch will get it too.
You tell more lies than Trump and Pence but I'll correct one of them
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...repeats-false-claim-clinton-foundations-limi/
"The American Institute of Philanthropy’s Charity Watch, reached the same conclusion. It has given the Clinton Foundation an A rating and says it spends only 12 percent of the money it raises on "overhead."
"The Clinton Foundation is an excellent charity," Charity Watch president Daniel Borochoff said Aug. 24, 2016, on CNN. "They are able to get 88 percent of their spending to bona fide program services and their fundraising efficiency is really low. It only costs them $2 to raise $100."
Other Republican critics of the foundation have used slightly higher figures than Pence. Republican National Committee chair Reince Priebus said the foundation only spent 20 percent on good works. Conservative radio talker Rush Limbaugh said it was 15 percent. Those are inaccurate, too.
Our ruling
Pence said 10 cents on every dollar from the Clinton Foundation goes to charitable causes. While it’s true that the foundation gives away in grants a small fraction of its resources, about 87 percent of its expenses go toward services it provides directly.
A leading expert in the finances of philanthropies, Mittendorf, says that while the Clinton Foundation calls itself a foundation, it operates like a public charity. Mittendorf cautioned that while the dollar amounts are clear and verified, that is no guarantee that the programs are effective and efficient. However, that is not the criticism Pence raised.
We rate this claim False."
There is Breitbart, there is Zerohedge, there is Jem. What is your source for these accusations, Jem? Tell us so we can sort out the probable from the improbable. I don't consider you a reliable source. What I mean by that, Jem, is that I don't trust anyone who may have a political motive to relay second hand information accurately or in context. And in that same regard, you should not trust me either. Lets make sure we state our sources.
Last edited: