Did you have something to say? It looks like you just took my previous post and added no comment?
expectancy=(prob of win x ave win) - (prob of loss X ave loss). This needs to be positive no matter what instrument you are trading.If agree that I am taking a hit on going with DITM Options. I don't really believe in a true expectancy for trading. I believe in Profit Factor/Ratio. Expectancy is great for static variables or casino games. I could trust Expectancy if I were an options seller with a hedge since max profit is known and taken from the start of the trade. The credit you get from an options sale is max profit up front.
I am using "expectancy" data from the underlying. Yeah I no doubt am taking a huge hit due to the bid/ask spread. I don't think you are trading a similar pattern to me, I built a custom ranking algo to screen my trades. I am basically doing this journal to see how well it is at picking market direction. It is not really a journal about options, heck I could switch to trading the underlying and I would still get the same exact signals.
Well if you already know or think you know, that you have a positive expectancy on the direction of the UL (which is not easy to do over a large sample) and the options are just to add leverage you should have no problem. look forward to reading your posts.No argument here on the wide bid/ask hurting my profitability. This is mainly about picking direction on individual stock names and I will need to be right a lot.
Unlike many wizards here on ET I am publicly posting directional bias and trades. It is ultimately an unproven system that is guilty until proven innocent. Even if the bid/ask eats me alive I already know that is has a positive expectancy trading the underlying.