You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Disproving atheists in 82 seconds
- Thread starter peilthetraveler
- Start date
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:
Tell us why you are so angry.
im not. i just come off angry because i have a low tolerance level for stupidity. i do what i do for amusement.
The way to deal with superstition is not to be polite to it, but to tackle it with all arms, and so rout it, cripple it, and make it forever infamous and ridiculous. Henry Louis Mencken
Quote from jem:
Hey asswipe cut the bullshit... I have been very careful to put their comments in context... unlike you I have no problem with the truth and facts and science. They could find infinite other universes tomorrow and it would not bother me. Although I would wonder what happens if I meet some of my wife's alternates.
when Hawking or Susskind or any of the other guys promote the mulitiverse theory, I almost always put that part of the explanation in.
You can see proof by just looking at my previous posts on this thread.
Quote from Brass:
The appearance of design is not evidence of design. "Thought experiments" don't qualify as evidence. Neither do circular arguments.
to bigarrow and your other clowns...
if you listen to the video... this is the odds against one constant being set up the way it is by random chance.
I hope you all grasp that significance. That is a zero for every atom in the universe.
10^(10^30) or --- 10^(100000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000), i.e., 1 followed by a thousand billion billion billion zeros (i.e., 1 followed by a nonillion zeros).
And Penrose is...
Sir Roger Penrose OM FRS (born 8 August 1931) is an English mathematical physicist and Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford and Emeritus Fellow of Wadham College. He has received a number of prizes and awards, including the 1988 Wolf Prize for physics which he shared with Stephen Hawking for their contribution to our understanding of the universe.[1] He is renowned for his work in mathematical physics, in particular his contributions to general relativity and cosmology. He is also a recreational mathematician and philosopher.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose
So if you want to argue the science... get the support of a scientist.
if you listen to the video... this is the odds against one constant being set up the way it is by random chance.
I hope you all grasp that significance. That is a zero for every atom in the universe.
10^(10^30) or --- 10^(100000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000), i.e., 1 followed by a thousand billion billion billion zeros (i.e., 1 followed by a nonillion zeros).
And Penrose is...
Sir Roger Penrose OM FRS (born 8 August 1931) is an English mathematical physicist and Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford and Emeritus Fellow of Wadham College. He has received a number of prizes and awards, including the 1988 Wolf Prize for physics which he shared with Stephen Hawking for their contribution to our understanding of the universe.[1] He is renowned for his work in mathematical physics, in particular his contributions to general relativity and cosmology. He is also a recreational mathematician and philosopher.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose
So if you want to argue the science... get the support of a scientist.
Quote from jem:
You have no idea who to defend your anti science view point... so you use the old lawyer trick and start banging on the tables when the science and the facts are not on your side.
here is the pied piper of atheism...
explaining to you all the appearance of fine tunings and the possible explanations.
<object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/mlD-CJPGt1A?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/mlD-CJPGt1A?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
here is Penrose... he is as big as you get in cosmology and math.
<object width="480" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/WhGdVMBk6Zo?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/WhGdVMBk6Zo?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
Quote from Free Thinker:
but when you misrepresent what scientists are saying to make it sound like they agree with your superstitious beliefs, that ok?
you mastered that trick... and then I presented your darling Dawkins telling you that many scientists say the universe appears fine tuned.
see your darling's recent video in the post just before this.
Quote from jem:
first of all your statement about lack of evidence is complete atheist head in the ground b.s.
They already had the symposiums on this subject through symposiums about the anthropic priniciple.
It took a decade or two but now almost all the leading scientists agree our universe appears designed.
This information became more public, when science found a new theory to match up with (explain) the appearance of design.
Chaos theory supplied the conjecture through Polchinski's and Susskind's work. Polichinsky found there could be 10 to the 500 solutions (near infinite) So Susskind made the conjecture.... all possible string theory solutions could be real universes.
So the majority of scientists are atheists and the VAST majority of
cosmologists, physicists, protobiologists, astronomers...ie. any of them that should know, are also atheists, but yet you say they think the universe is designed. .......I call bullshit.
Quote from futurecurrents:
So the majority of scientists are atheists and the VAST majority of
cosmologists, physicists, protobiologists, astronomers...ie. any of them that should know, are also atheists, but yet you say they think the universe is designed. .......I call bullshit.
Keep up that strong ignorance by introducing unsupported and irrelevant b.s. - while the other guy... introduces top scientists.
Way to go team a-t-h-e-i-s-m.
did you even watch the video's, do you realize how fricken ignorant you are keeping yourself... about science... just to support and outdated world view dumped upon you by idiots with a similar agenda?