Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

futurecurrents · Mar 5, 2012

Quote from Trader666:

Hawking once claimed that if the universe eventually collapsed after expanding, time would flow backwards (and later retracted it) so he's far from infallible. His claim that the universe spontaneously created itself from nothing is even more ridiculous and wild speculation at best.

Oh man, YOU'RE judging Stephen Hawking! That might be one of the funniest thing I've read here in quite some time.

deltastrike · Mar 5, 2012

What are credentials of the guy in the video? Either this clip is taken out of context or this guy doesn't understand what he's talking about.

Trader666 · Mar 5, 2012

What's funnier is how rubes like you bow down to whatever your science "gods" say. Hawking was dead wrong about time reversing (among other things) which was a huge blunder and if you had a brain and an education, you'd know the difference between science and wild speculation. Scientists don't even understand the structure of the universe, let alone know how it was created... so for someone to "think" it spontaneously created itself from nothing simply because Hawking said so is the height of naivete and ignorance.

Quote from futurecurrents:

Oh man, YOU'RE judging Stephen Hawking! That might be one of the funniest thing I've read here in quite some time.

futurecurrents · Mar 5, 2012

Quote from Trader666:

What's funnier is how rubes like you bow down to whatever your science "gods" say. Hawking was dead wrong about time reversing (among other things) which was a huge blunder and if you had a brain and an education, you'd know the difference between science and wild speculation. Scientists don't even understand the structure of the universe, let alone know how it was created... so for someone to "think" it spontaneously created itself from nothing simply because Hawking said so is the height of naivete and ignorance.

Oh man, now the brainless high school drop-out is talking about brains and education? This is too funny.

lindq · Mar 5, 2012

Quote from rew:

It's getting to that first bacterium that's the puzzler.

That was easy. It was getting to the first atom that was the real trick.

Trader666 · Mar 5, 2012

Speaking of brainless dropouts, tell us why you "thought" that because life exists on earth, that somehow "proves" it "came from simple terrestrial processes."

Quote from futurecurrents:

Oh man, now the brainless high school drop-out is talking about brains and education? This is too funny.

futurecurrents · Mar 5, 2012

Quote from Trader666:

Speaking of brainless dropouts, tell us why you "thought" that because life exists on earth, that somehow "proves" it "came from simple terrestrial processes."

Because there is no other logical explanation. I know using logic is a foreign concept to you. People with IQ's below 85 have a hard time with it.

Trader666 · Mar 5, 2012

Thanks for confirming you're an idiot.

Quote from futurecurrents:

Because there is no other logical explanation.

stu · Mar 6, 2012

Quote from jem:
you lying troll.
For years you said we had proof that life came from non life. It took five years for me to quote so many scientists you gave up on your b.s. and admitted that there is no proof life evolved from non life.
don't even speak about rational argument. you lie faster than a democrat in budget debate.

Ah yes the "proof that life came from non life". That would be in the same thread there were so many quotes you decided to lie about being an atheist.

stu · Mar 6, 2012

Trying to argue that life from inorganic matter is not feasible, is like trying to say falling by gravity can't happen.