Well, it is, and always has been, a mutually exclusive choice.
Disloyal Pence Aide Testifes Against Trump
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
Not deep enough to actually take a stand. Like Trump, he's also looking out for Number One. When, in fact, they're both a steaming pile of Number Twos.
That was then. This is now. Now she's a deep state never-Trumper.
I don’t know. As I said before, Pence is a weird guy. He sees loyalty to Trump through a religious lens because he thinks leaders are divinely chosen.
But it sort of crashes because Pence has governmental experience and understands how to run an executive branch without running afoul of the law. He doesn’t have a problem getting professional personnel, Trump does.
And when his staff has to interact with the chaos and disorder of Trump’s White House it can be disastrous. As we are witnessing with this aide.
She is under no obligation to testify. No one else who is still pretending to work at the WH is testifying.
Bottom line is she is trying to get her own president impeached. She must be forced to walk the plank in the most humiliating manner possible.
I never trusted Pence, not after he cucked on the trans bathroom law in Indiana. He has some explaining to do.
All she had to do was refuse to testify. Instead, she is yet another Deep State op pretending that her foreign policy should take precedence over the guy who was actually elected to be president.
The ball's in Pence's court now. Let's see if he has the stones to stand up for the MAGA voters or if he is another backstabbing cuck.
What if she testified to something that is true?
I am just sitting back and letting the information fall where it may but you are extremely upset at anyone who says anything negative against the President. Is providing information to Congress now treason? If what she stated is true in her testimony then she has done nothing wrong.
In your world, anyone who testifies against their boss is wrong, no matter what the boss did. let the process run its course.
By the way, if impeachment is in the Constitution, then it is allowed to proceed as it is proceeding.
Correct.
And exactly why the Senate is authorized to subpoena Joe, Hunter, and the WhistleSpy, and others.
MORE TO COME.
But they are not part of the impeachment so why should they be subpoenaed...that is a whole different issue altogether. What could Joe Biden testify on with respect to phone calls and deals between Trump and the Ukraine?
Joe is no longer in office so you cannot go back in time and impeach him. Trump can bring it up in the election all he wants but you need to research more about the impeachment process.