Disgraceful... Schumer Threatens Kavanaugh and Gorsuch over Abortion

A year after his confirmation hearing, Brett Kavanaugh faces a new sexual misconduct allegation
The Supreme Court justice faces a new allegation, and fresh corroboration of an old one.

By Anya van Wagtendonkanyavw@protonmail.com Updated Sep 15, 2019, 3:45pm EDT
GettyImages_1046729610.0.jpg

Protesters demonstrate against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh at the US Capitol in October 2018.
Roberto Schmidt/AFP/Getty Images
A new allegation of sexual misconduct has been levied against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh by journalists investigating the accusations that roiled his confirmation hearings last fall. The New York Times details new corroborations of an allegation of sexual misconduct brought by Kavanaugh’s classmate, Deborah Ramirez, as well as a previously undisclosed allegation that mirrors the one Ramirez made in 2018.

The report also found the FBI declined to follow up on any of the 25 witnesses Ramirez provided to confirm her allegation, and that the agency also did not investigate the new allegation, which accused Kavanaugh of forcing his penis into the hand of a female classmate while drunk. Ramirez has said the Supreme Court justice did something similar to her at another party, exposing his penis to her, forcing her to touch it in an attempt to get away.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...sconduct-allegation-deborah-ramirez-max-stier
 
so you posted this unfounded bullshit twice in the same thread?
just to emphasize the severity of Schumer's chosen crime of blackmail.
talk about fake news....

he was the crime boss (democrat senator) who spearheaded the last crime along with Sen Feinstein and probably cost the dems the senate?



piezoe said:
A year after his confirmation hearing, Brett Kavanaugh faces a new sexual misconduct allegation
The Supreme Court justice faces a new allegation, and fresh corroboration of an old one.

By Anya van Wagtendonkanyavw@protonmail.com Updated Sep 15, 2019, 3:45pm EDT
GettyImages_1046729610.0.jpg

Protesters demonstrate against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh at the US Capitol in October 2018.
Roberto Schmidt/AFP/Getty Images
A new allegation of sexual misconduct has been levied against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh by journalists investigating the accusations that roiled his confirmation hearings last fall. The New York Times details new corroborations of an allegation of sexual misconduct brought by Kavanaugh’s classmate, Deborah Ramirez, as well as a previously undisclosed allegation that mirrors the one Ramirez made in 2018.

The report also found the FBI declined to follow up on any of the 25 witnesses Ramirez provided to confirm her allegation, and that the agency also did not investigate the new allegation, which accused Kavanaugh of forcing his penis into the hand of a female classmate while drunk. Ramirez has said the Supreme Court justice did something similar to her at another party, exposing his penis to her, forcing her to touch it in an attempt to get away.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...sconduct-allegation-deborah-ramirez-max-stier
More...
 
Kavanah visibly distraught . . . . . . the boss's body language is like 'You're going to fix this right!!

and Kavanah is like . . . . . 'Boss , I'd rather have a drink than this pressure.'



upload_2020-3-5_22-11-55.png
 
...
Kavanaugh vigorously denied this allegation during his confirmation hearing, and also denied the allegation of Christine Blasey Ford, who said he had pinned her down, covered her mouth, and groped her during a high school party. He called these allegations politically motivated, and ultimately squeaked through to being confirmed to the bench by a vote of 50-48.

At the time of Kavanaugh’s confirmation, Democrats raised concerns that he may have perjured himself on several occasions. These concerns were dismissed, however.

But the new account of sexual misconduct, its similarity to Ramirez’s allegations, and fresh information about the number of people willing to confirm Ramirez’s account have once again raised concerns over the justice’s honesty during his confirmation hearings. And the fact he repeatedly denied any and all allegations against him have led to new questions over whether Kavanaugh may have perjured himself, as well.

The new allegations against Brett Kavanaugh, briefly explained
Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the journalists behind the report, spent 10 months investigating the accusations against Kavanaugh. They found Ramirez’s allegation to be credible, in part because their work showed that Yale students, as well as Ramirez’s mother, had discussed the incident at the party in the weeks following Kavanaugh’s alleged harassment.

The authors were also told of a similar incident at a separate party by Kavanaugh’s classmate Max Stier, who currently runs a nonprofit in Washington, DC. Stier said he told senators and the FBI about his experience with Kavanaugh, alleging the justice forced his penis into the hand of a woman during his freshman year. The FBI did not investigate Stier’s claims, however.

Nor did the agency interview anyone on the list of at least 25 people that Ramirez’s legal team provided in order to corroborate her story. Two FBI agents reportedly told Ramirez that they found her story to be credible, but said that their team could not conduct a full investigation without the support of the Republican-controlled Senate. They, of course, did not have this support, and so no investigation occurred. Ramirez did not testify during the confirmation hearings, either.

Without her present and lacking any questioning of her witnesses, Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-IA) ultimately found Ramirez’s allegation to be uncorroborated, and almost all Senate Republicans — joined by Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia — voted to confirm Kavanaugh.

Kavanaugh declined to be interviewed by the journalists, whose work will soon be collected into a book, and has not released any kind of statement since the new allegations were made public. But on Twitter, President Donald Trump, who nominated Kavanaugh and celebrated his confirmation, blasted the claims and encouraged the justice to begin libel proceedings against his accusers.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...sconduct-allegation-deborah-ramirez-max-stier
 
Last edited:
piezoe said:
...
Kavanaugh vigorously denied this allegation during his confirmation hearing, and also denied the allegation of Christine Blasey Ford, who said he had pinned her down, covered her mouth, and groped her during a high school party. He called these allegations politically motivated, and ultimately squeaked through to being confirmed to the bench by a vote of 50-48.

At the time of Kavanaugh’s confirmation, Democrats raised concerns that he may have perjured himself on several occasions. These concerns were dismissed, however.

But the new account of sexual misconduct, its similarity to Ramirez’s allegations, and fresh information about the number of people willing to confirm Ramirez’s account have once again raised concerns over the justice’s honesty during his confirmation hearings. And the fact he repeatedly denied any and all allegations against him have led to new questions over whether Kavanaugh may have perjured himself, as well.

The new allegations against Brett Kavanaugh, briefly explained
Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, the journalists behind the report, spent 10 months investigating the accusations against Kavanaugh. They found Ramirez’s allegation to be credible, in part because their work showed that Yale students, as well as Ramirez’s mother, had discussed the incident at the party in the weeks following Kavanaugh’s alleged harassment.

The authors were also told of a similar incident at a separate party by Kavanaugh’s classmate Max Stier, who currently runs a nonprofit in Washington, DC. Stier said he told senators and the FBI about his experience with Kavanaugh, alleging the justice forced his penis into the hand of a woman during his freshman year. The FBI did not investigate Stier’s claims, however.

Nor did the agency interview anyone on the list of at least 25 people that Ramirez’s legal team provided in order to corroborate her story. Two FBI agents reportedly told Ramirez that they found her story to be credible, but said that their team could not conduct a full investigation without the support of the Republican-controlled Senate. They, of course, did not have this support, and so no investigation occurred. Ramirez did not testify during the confirmation hearings, either.

Without her present and lacking any questioning of her witnesses, Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-IA) ultimately found Ramirez’s allegation to be uncorroborated, and almost all Senate Republicans — joined by Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia — voted to confirm Kavanaugh.

Kavanaugh declined to be interviewed by the journalists, whose work will soon be collected into a book, and has not released any kind of statement since the new allegations were made public. But on Twitter, President Donald Trump, who nominated Kavanaugh and celebrated his confirmation, blasted the claims and encouraged the justice to begin libel proceedings against his accusers.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...sconduct-allegation-deborah-ramirez-max-stier
More...

Piezoe, you claimed the Mueller Report stated that Trump colluded with Russia to rig the 2016 election, but you failed to produce a reference. Where is it?

You also claimed that Mueller said he would indite Trump if rules allowed it. I am still waiting on evidence of that.
 
wildchild said:
Piezoe, you claimed the Mueller Report stated that Trump colluded with Russia
More...
Where did you come up with that? Go back and read my post. I made it very clear exactly what Mueller said, and that wasn't what he said and wasn't what he wrote in his report. Go back and read my post again. It is very clear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top