Quote from LOgg:
I have not recorded my findings nor have I found anything useful on the net prior to playing. Two guys taught me the basics (their parents played IDK how good they were) years before I stepped into the casino. I actually spent a few days at the casino to 'figure' it out. Not betting first 10 rounds will give you an edge, many early face cards showing up normally resulted in more streaks, and less usually resulted in more skips. There can be resistance points example: max 3 streak in a row by banker/player X amount of times. Keep in mind you shoudl only bet when you believe you have a high probability of winning. The more you bet the more chance you have giving your $ to the casino. If you're a decent trader and you take a few weekends to study bacc I wouldn't be surprised if you figured it out yourself. I think that's as much depth as I can go into as much as I like bacc
You mean you don't keep a record of your bacc sessions like you would when trading? Where you say "not betting the first 10 rounds will give you an edge"....have you quantified that hypothesis? Do you lose your edge if you just sit through 9 rounds of not betting? Could you walk me through the math of all of this , especially the resistance point hypothesis you mentioned. The vig you pay in bacc makes it a negative expectation game, show me the math of how this would not be true. Seriously, if you're as good as you say, you should be able to show some depth unless you're a clairvoyant.
And, I do know and have played a lot of bacc in my stupid days and then decided that of all the negative expectation games, the bacc has odds of 1.06, slightly better than a toss of a coin, but still NEGATIVE. Would you hypothesize that you can find predictability and future trends in coin tosses?
