Quote from nukethewhales31:
thats correct same idea but this time we dont need to swap lsd's or sld's as tick data is very clear of its movements and only goes in one direction
Nuke,
you have said when using tickdata there would be no need to swap SLD's and LSD's.could you explane please
when using tickdata one would be able to determine how far price has moved from open before returning back to open, wouldnt this just add one more variant of SD and make the LSD the highest number of the usual SD and the Amount of pips/ticks that have been reached from open before returning to open again ?
lets say a bar has
open at 1,5000
high at 1,5050
low at 1,4990
and wenn using tickdata we have found that price went from open 1,5000 to 1,5020 before returing to open and making the high
so for this bar we would have a LD of 50pip ( L-O )
an SD of 10pip ( O-L ) but we have seen price going 20pip up before returing to open so this should make an SD the highest of MAX( 10, 20 ) = 20 pip, is this correct?
why is there no need anymore to swap any SD that is (and still could be) bigger than the ShortestLongestDistance over N-bars ?
where am i wrong in my thinking,
isnt it still possible to find higher SD's from last bar than N related SLD's ?
what has to be done to eliminate the 20% statistical failure