Didn't Obama claim all the Chemical weapons were removed from Syria?

1. She got 150 million and approved the sale.
We can talk about how the other approvals were garnered. but... she approved.

2 They lost track of the uranium and it did leave the country - the articles are here on et if you care to search for them.

3. I am not concerned about 8 years. I am concerned he gave them the right to make themselves nuke ready starting in 10 years. That is crazy.

Tony Stark said:
1.Hilliary didn't have the power to approve the uranium deal on her own,9 agencies had to approve
  1. Department of the Treasury (chair)
  2. Department of Justice
  3. Department of Homeland Security
  4. Department of Commerce
  5. Department of Defense
  6. Department of State
  7. Department of Energy
  8. Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
  9. Office of Science & Technology Policy

2.The uranium is still here and can't be exported.



3.Iran's nuke program does not get the go ahead in 2027.Part of the deal is that Iran had to agree to abide by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty that they signed in 1974.If Iran starts building nukes in 2027 they are in violation of the contract.If Iran starts building nukes in 2027 not only has Obama prevented Iran from getting nukes on his watch but 2 terms after his presidency as well,pretty dam good.
More...
 
You guys do know that grassroot cults have been known to manufacture Sarin and VX on an insignificant budget right?
 
Tony Stark said:
Nearly everyone agrees Iran was close to having nukes,so they do know how to make them.They currently don't have nukes because of the deal Obama made with Iran and the rest of the major world powers.So it is a completely true statement.

Bush left Obama with a nuclear armed N Korea.Obama left Trump with a nuclear free Iran.
More...

If they knew how to make them, they would have. Idiot.
 
wildchild said:
If they knew how to make them, they would have. Idiot.
More...

If they didn't know how to make them there would have been no need for The Iran deal and your fellow Obama haters on ET wouldn't be arguing that they can make in 10 years.Idiot

BTW ,they already had them 90% made,Idiot
 
jem said:
1. She got 150 million and approved the sale.
We can talk about how the other approvals were garnered. but... she approved.

2 They lost track of the uranium and it did leave the country - the articles are here on et if you care to search for them.

3. I am not concerned about 8 years. I am concerned he gave them the right to make themselves nuke ready starting in 10 years. That is crazy.
More...


1.Again,9 agencies approved the sale.She wasnt even the head of the committee who makes the decision if the deal is approved

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/


The Uranium One deal was not Clinton’s to veto or approve

Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself “never intervened” in committee matters.




2.Source?

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.






3.If Iran breaks the deal and makes nukes in 10 years it will be the 2027 President's job to stop them.Obama did his job,he prevented Iran from getting nukes on his watch.
 
Last edited:
snopes is not the least bit trustworthy.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...iran-blunder-by-obama/?utm_term=.f753306924da

One final Iran blunder by Obama

...


Iran is to receive a huge shipment of natural uranium from Russia to compensate it for exporting tons of reactor coolant, diplomats say, in a move approved by the outgoing U.S. administration and other governments seeking to keep Tehran committed to a landmark nuclear pact.

Two senior diplomats said the transfer recently approved by the U.S. and five other world powers that negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran foresees delivery of 116 metric tons (nearly 130 tons) of natural uranium.

Rather than police the deal to ensure compliance, the Obama administration is assisting Iran in violating the JCPOA. Ceren remarks, “That’s enough for more than 10 nuclear bombs.” We both allow the Iranians to exceed the heavy-water limits in the deal — and then richly compensate them with uranium that can be used for bombs. Our allies would be excused for thinking we are now promoting Iran’s interests, not the West’s.
 
jem said:
snopes is not the least bit trustworthy.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...iran-blunder-by-obama/?utm_term=.f753306924da

One final Iran blunder by Obama

...


Iran is to receive a huge shipment of natural uranium from Russia to compensate it for exporting tons of reactor coolant, diplomats say, in a move approved by the outgoing U.S. administration and other governments seeking to keep Tehran committed to a landmark nuclear pact.

Two senior diplomats said the transfer recently approved by the U.S. and five other world powers that negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran foresees delivery of 116 metric tons (nearly 130 tons) of natural uranium.

Rather than police the deal to ensure compliance, the Obama administration is assisting Iran in violating the JCPOA. Ceren remarks, “That’s enough for more than 10 nuclear bombs.” We both allow the Iranians to exceed the heavy-water limits in the deal — and then richly compensate them with uranium that can be used for bombs. Our allies would be excused for thinking we are now promoting Iran’s interests, not the West’s.
More...

Are you saying they got the uranium from the uranium one deal?
 
jem said:
snopes is rarely accurate... its not credible.. as your past may be pointing out... sources are needed.
More...


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-trump-inaccurately-suggests-clinton-got-pai/


Donald Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal



Clinton’s unsubstantiated role

Did Clinton singlehandedly imperil national security by greenlighting the Russian deal, as Trump implies? No.

The company in question, Uranium One, does have mines, mills and tracts of land in Wyoming, Utah and other U.S. states equal to about 20 percent of U.S. uranium production capacity. It churns out a smaller portion of actual uranium produced in the United States (11 percent in 2014), according to Oilprice.com.

But that’s less cause for alarm than Trump is suggesting.

For one, the United States doesn’t actually produce all that much uranium (about 2 percent in 2015) and is actually a net importer of the chemical, according to Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at Middlebury Institute and former director at the New America Foundation.

For another, Russia doesn’t have the licenses to export uranium outside the United States, Oilprice.org pointed out, "so it’s somewhat disingenuous to say this uranium is now Russia’s, to do with what it pleases." The Kremlin was likely more interested in Uranium One’s assets in Kazakhstan, the world’s largest producer.

Trump is also wrong that Clinton alone allowed the transfer.

The Kremlin’s 2010 purchase of a controlling stake in Uranium One had to be approved by the nine members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.


That included Clinton as secretary of state, but also the secretaries of the Treasury (the chairman of the committee), Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security as well as the the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. The deal also had to be okayed by the independent Nuclear Regulatory Commission as well as Utah’s nuclear regulator.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top