If you are referring to 9-11 that happened on Bushs watch.
The first WTC attack and OK bombing was on Clinton but that is mostly the job of law enforcement not the defense department.
Didn't Obama claim all the Chemical weapons were removed from Syria?
- Thread starter wildchild
- Start date
If you are referring to 9-11 that happened on Bushs watch.
The first WTC attack and OK bombing was on Clinton but that is mostly the job of law enforcement not the defense department.
Alright, I'm gonna say it, so as to clear up some confusion.
Even more than the likelihood this was a "rebel" tactic used for the second time, i think it's even more likely that Trump himself, yes Trump himself, who worked closely with the Islamo-rebels, the military industrial complex, and the main stream media, to first think of gassing the children, and then to make the gassing of children happen.
There. I said it. Deal with it.
Some of us have been betrayed.
Others of us have been given a political orgasm.
Even more than the likelihood this was a "rebel" tactic used for the second time, i think it's even more likely that Trump himself, yes Trump himself, who worked closely with the Islamo-rebels, the military industrial complex, and the main stream media, to first think of gassing the children, and then to make the gassing of children happen.
There. I said it. Deal with it.
Some of us have been betrayed.
Others of us have been given a political orgasm.
Yes. I said it. You can quote me.
Furthermore, if it was not clear enough before, I said the gassing of children was Trump's idea. Doesn't matter if there is a war going on within the White House or Congress. Trump is there, in charge.
I'm not even saying this was a dumb Priebus idea. I'm saying this came out, initially, and unprovoked, as an idea out of Trump's own 4D chess playing, genious, flexible mind.
It came from Trump directly, and not through some bitter old generals playing war.
I'm saying that Trump has actually gassed some children to take some of the heat off his faltering presidency.
I'm saying that the gassing, with sarin or any other chemical, was HIS idea, and not Kushner or Ivanka.
Deal with it.
Furthermore, if it was not clear enough before, I said the gassing of children was Trump's idea. Doesn't matter if there is a war going on within the White House or Congress. Trump is there, in charge.
I'm not even saying this was a dumb Priebus idea. I'm saying this came out, initially, and unprovoked, as an idea out of Trump's own 4D chess playing, genious, flexible mind.
It came from Trump directly, and not through some bitter old generals playing war.
I'm saying that Trump has actually gassed some children to take some of the heat off his faltering presidency.
I'm saying that the gassing, with sarin or any other chemical, was HIS idea, and not Kushner or Ivanka.
Deal with it.
Oh yah. One more thing.
Except for the Islamo-rebels trying to replace the secular elected president of the most Christian nation in the middle east, Trump is the only one that is smart enough, 5D chess playing enough, to realize he could sell out his base and still be elected next time with the help of Hillary's rich friends...smart enough to insure the Islamo-rebels had the chemical munitions needed to pull off their side of the gassing-of-the-children operation.
I don't know the name of Trump's gassing-of-the-children operation, I only know the initial idea for it had to come from the smartest brain in the White House, where Trump is fully in charge of every aspect.
Except for the Islamo-rebels trying to replace the secular elected president of the most Christian nation in the middle east, Trump is the only one that is smart enough, 5D chess playing enough, to realize he could sell out his base and still be elected next time with the help of Hillary's rich friends...smart enough to insure the Islamo-rebels had the chemical munitions needed to pull off their side of the gassing-of-the-children operation.
I don't know the name of Trump's gassing-of-the-children operation, I only know the initial idea for it had to come from the smartest brain in the White House, where Trump is fully in charge of every aspect.
Where did you see Trump supporters supporting this attack?
The things I read seem to be showing establishment puppets like Rubio and McCain and Graham... plus the Wall street journal some of the MSM and other never trump types supporting this bombing.
Most of his base seem to be against it.
Note...
I am all for supporting little babies but I don't see helping al queda or Isis fill in a vacuum if Assad falls could be a good thing. This seems to be exactly what Hillary Clinton and Kerry and Obama or Bush would do. Have we not learned anything about the establishments incompetence yet?
As Rand Paul says... we were not attacked. Congress has not declared war. And I have seen no evidence that anyone has any idea of what should be done. Its seems we have no plan but to create a vacuum and provoke Russia.
Seriously, does anyone here have a plan. Any lefty in the media. And establishment republican... Anyone in D.C.
If not... this is stupid. Establishment stupidity at best... and could be some sort of play for oil or finance at its worst.
There should be a law... no war without a declaration of Congress... oh wait we have that.
And no war without a plan for victory and maintenance of peace afterwards.
I spoke with a former military guy last night. He says many in the military believe there is no point in trying to win in the middle east because the Muslims don't want anything to do with our ideas.
I suspect he is correct.
The things I read seem to be showing establishment puppets like Rubio and McCain and Graham... plus the Wall street journal some of the MSM and other never trump types supporting this bombing.
Most of his base seem to be against it.
Note...
I am all for supporting little babies but I don't see helping al queda or Isis fill in a vacuum if Assad falls could be a good thing. This seems to be exactly what Hillary Clinton and Kerry and Obama or Bush would do. Have we not learned anything about the establishments incompetence yet?
As Rand Paul says... we were not attacked. Congress has not declared war. And I have seen no evidence that anyone has any idea of what should be done. Its seems we have no plan but to create a vacuum and provoke Russia.
Seriously, does anyone here have a plan. Any lefty in the media. And establishment republican... Anyone in D.C.
If not... this is stupid. Establishment stupidity at best... and could be some sort of play for oil or finance at its worst.
There should be a law... no war without a declaration of Congress... oh wait we have that.
And no war without a plan for victory and maintenance of peace afterwards.
I spoke with a former military guy last night. He says many in the military believe there is no point in trying to win in the middle east because the Muslims don't want anything to do with our ideas.
I suspect he is correct.
Last edited:
Small-mindedness again here on the board.
Last edited:
Same folks that showed numbers with Hillary winning? --I noticed that you don't incorporate a lot of original thought in your postings.
Your statement and assessment are woefully incorrect.
I notice you don't know the difference between pollsters and historians and Hillary got millions of more votes than Trump,just as the pollsters said she would.