The impacts of the ban n short selling is a myth.
Lets use facts instead of rhetoric.
1. The average daily short sale volume in Morgan Stanley during the ban as near identical to the average daily volume before the ban. (i.e. No impact)
2. The short sale ban altered a change in trade pattern that was about to destroy Morgan Stanley as the three day period that led to this ban illustrates exponential rise in daily short volume.
3. The recent markets and market crisis expose how abusive and inefficient a market can be when short sellers are not held accountable for settling trades. The SEC has long failed to address settlement failure abuses in the short sale process. Ironically they failed during a period when the market was flat or appreciating. Now that the market is collapsing you can see how easily trades can suddenly be covered. Now that it is cost effective to cover, trades are suddenly efficient.
So did the ban work? Yes it worked. It allowed shot sales tcontinue without high levels of manipulation and the trades are suddeny settling. To say that the markets fell despite no short selling is also false since short sale volume remained in MS despitet ban and remained at near normal levels.
Below are links to the raw data that supports these claims. I hope those that talk about this in an alternative view can likewise do so with data.
Morgan Stanley daily Short Sale Volume as reported by the NYSE:
http://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/ms_shorts.pdf
Regulation SHO Threshold List Companies Trend Lines (2005 - present)
http://investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/node/464
Lets use facts instead of rhetoric.
1. The average daily short sale volume in Morgan Stanley during the ban as near identical to the average daily volume before the ban. (i.e. No impact)
2. The short sale ban altered a change in trade pattern that was about to destroy Morgan Stanley as the three day period that led to this ban illustrates exponential rise in daily short volume.
3. The recent markets and market crisis expose how abusive and inefficient a market can be when short sellers are not held accountable for settling trades. The SEC has long failed to address settlement failure abuses in the short sale process. Ironically they failed during a period when the market was flat or appreciating. Now that the market is collapsing you can see how easily trades can suddenly be covered. Now that it is cost effective to cover, trades are suddenly efficient.
So did the ban work? Yes it worked. It allowed shot sales tcontinue without high levels of manipulation and the trades are suddeny settling. To say that the markets fell despite no short selling is also false since short sale volume remained in MS despitet ban and remained at near normal levels.
Below are links to the raw data that supports these claims. I hope those that talk about this in an alternative view can likewise do so with data.
Morgan Stanley daily Short Sale Volume as reported by the NYSE:
http://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/ms_shorts.pdf
Regulation SHO Threshold List Companies Trend Lines (2005 - present)
http://investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/node/464