Quote from Locutus:
You're so obnoxious I have to put you on ignore.
To answer your point, the bad stuff was already known and the government intervention is really an unknown. It certainly can't be a negative going forward.
To answer about the gvmt creating jobs etc: I think you are confusing monetary with fiscal policy. Monetary policy (what the Fed does and by the way the Fed is not the government so I don't know how you could've thought I was implying QE3, because I am not) can't create jobs, however fiscal policy can and has in the past created jobs. Just look at Roosevelt's new deal thing for example. The government can just say "Go dig a hole and we'll pay you (with money the Fed has freshly printed)". This would create jobs and increase the deficit, which is really what needs to be done. If we are lucky, although this isn't at all necessary, the projects done will also increase future GDP in ways other than the employment, for example infrastructure, which is exactly what Obama has hinted at today. The government has been far too soft passive in its policy because of silly pro-cyclical republicans (tax cuts when everything is going well and budget cuts when the economy is down in the dumps...how much worse can a policy get really?).
It's not like this is the first report that's been pretty horrible. ALl of them since January have been pretty god awful and there hasn't been any job creation for the whole of 2011. The government *has* to be the job creator of last resort until we are back on track again.