Did DB and the Price Action Scribblers Throw in the Towel?

Frederick Foresight said:
Jealous of LW? Yeah, that's it. 'Cause there ain't nowhere higher to aim, pardner. Did you actually read the article?! LW is a joke.

Meanwhile what is your obsession with defending someone who can't trade worth a shit when someone else is watching, but can somehow make money for himself while simultaneously losing money for his clients. Oh, and that was back in the day when price stamps were loosey-goosey. Was the NFA klaxon not loud enough?
More...

Yes, i defend my friends.

The NFA investigation did not result in anything.

Is that all you have ?

After 1000's of students, dozens of haters, and others don't you think more dirt would be dug up?

You really are grasping at straws.

surf
 
dbphoenix said:
And your inability to let it go even though I don't post content here anymore generates publicity for both of us.

Keep it comin'.

(I'll be reaching two thousand likes soon; perhaps you'll put me over the top)
More...
I just helped you out with the likes. Good luck at your cult site.

surf
 
Last edited:
marketsurfer said:
...The NFA investigation did not result in anything...

...You really are grasping at straws.

surf
More...
In your own words, what do you think the NFA was trying to convey to the reader with its findings and conclusion:

€"There is no question that Mr. Williams's personal trading accounts had a material effect upon his composite trading performance. The record reflects that for the first quarter of 1987, Mr. Williams's composite performance showed a loss of $6,122,281, while at the same time Mr. Williams's personal accounts experienced a gain of $902,599. The Panel finds that the fact Mr. Williams was making significant gains while managed customer accounts were suffering considerable losses would be a material fact which a potential customer would need to know in order to make a fully reasoned decision."

Being a journalist, how would you paraphrase that passage in your own words?
 
Frederick Foresight said:
In your own words, what do you think the NFA was trying to convey to the reader with its findings and conclusion:

€"There is no question that Mr. Williams's personal trading accounts had a material effect upon his composite trading performance. The record reflects that for the first quarter of 1987, Mr. Williams's composite performance showed a loss of $6,122,281, while at the same time Mr. Williams's personal accounts experienced a gain of $902,599. The Panel finds that the fact Mr. Williams was making significant gains while managed customer accounts were suffering considerable losses would be a material fact which a potential customer would need to know in order to make a fully reasoned decision."

Being a journalist, how would you paraphrase that passage in your own words?
More...


I guess the NFA wants clients to know about all his accounts 28 years ago??

Larry has offered to explain this to you years ago. You refuse to ask him directly.

Being a journalist, i asked him directly and was satisfied with the answer.

I dont get your point.

surf
 
marketsurfer said:
I guess the NFA wants clients to know about all his accounts 28 years ago??

Larry has offered to explain this to you years ago. You refuse to ask him directly.

Being a journalist, i asked him directly and was satisfied with the answer.

I dont get your point.

surf
More...
Being a journalist, please share his explanation and the reason for your satisfaction with it.
 
Last edited:
And speaking of towels...

"Any man who can hitch the length and breadth of the galaxy, rough it, slum it, struggle against terrible odds, win through, and still know where his towel is is clearly a man to be reckoned with."
- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top