Quote from Grandluxe:
Dude, there will always be making money no matter the circumstance, but not everyone is trading like you think with "2B" trendlines, backdoor entry, inside bars, breakout bars or whatever you call it.
We are playing the same game but on a different field.
A lot of the trades that we make based on knowledge of various execution algorithms, the interaction between different levels of the L2 book and correlation amongst the various execution venues are now gone. Deciphering the information leakage from these microstructures are not possible anymore due to the liquidity collapse. If altucher is intimately associated as he claims with hedge funds and prop firms, he will at least have an inkling of what I am talking about. This is not stuff you read about when you pick up that book from Amazon.com. Don't get me wrong, I am not dissing you, its great that you are making money but the point that Altucher is making is a very salient one.
Sure, I perfectly understand what you are talking about and know people who were successful in scalping FI using DOM and other quant ways to trade, but had to abandon their fields, because their edge was much eroded by some changes.
But then James should have stated in his article, that he talks about only quantitative strategies applicable for HF's etc.
I know that the way I trade is not "serious" enough for HF world, because it's not scalable enough and because it's parameters can't be quantified enough to suit the risk mgmt requirements, but when someone says "impossible", IMO it better be emphasized, what exactly is impossible.
Otherwise it may be deceptive information for his readers, rather than useful. Because certainly many ways to trade are not just alive, but are easier than ever to use.
