Diamond of ‘Diamond and Silk’ Dies Suddenly from COVID, Trump says 'heart gave out'

exGOPer said:
You completely ignored Lucy Kerr's conflict of interest.

You also ignored that the author of the study you quoted said Ivermectin isn't the right treatment for COVID-19.

Here is something you will be interested in given your obsession with heart disease

Xie, Y., Xu, E., Bowe, B. et al. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med 28, 583–590 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01689-3

We show that, beyond the first 30 d after infection, individuals with COVID-19 are at increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease spanning several categories, including cerebrovascular disorders, dysrhythmias, ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease, pericarditis, myocarditis, heart failure and thromboembolic disease. These risks and burdens were evident even among individuals who were not hospitalized during the acute phase of the infection and increased in a graded fashion according to the care setting during the acute phase (non-hospitalized, hospitalized and admitted to intensive care). Our results provide evidence that the risk and 1-year burden of cardiovascular disease in survivors of acute COVID-19 are substantial.
More...
Yawn. More deflection from the deflectors. Totally irrelevant to the study outcome. Erratum like these don’t change the results. Unlike in your flawed and corrupt together trial sponsored by FTX. GIVE US THE RESULTS WE WANT AND WE WILL GIVE YOU MANY MONIES. Now that’s a bribe.
 
exGOPer said:
Weak whataboutism

Feel free to post evidence with a peer reviewed study showing the vaccines are causing excess deaths.



Study is sponsored by an Ivermectin manufacturer, how is that not relevant? They are paying doctor's for the study who then go on to promote Ivermectin in their private practice. Why isn't that relevant to the study which doesn't even publish their data.
More...
And Pfizer sponsored their own safe and effective vaccine clinical trials. Many of them. All got the same falsified data. Rigged and manipulated. And YOU INJECTED YOURSELF BASED ON THEM. Conflicts don’t matter to you. You are walking living proof of a mass psychosis pincushion.
When is your next safe and effective vaccine? If you haven’t taken 5 then you clearly don’t believe in it.
 
exGOPer said:
Weak whataboutism

Feel free to post evidence with a peer reviewed study showing the vaccines are causing excess deaths.



Study is sponsored by an Ivermectin manufacturer, how is that not relevant? They are paying doctor's for the study who then go on to promote Ivermectin in their private practice. Why isn't that relevant to the study which doesn't even publish their data.
More...
Any study not provided to you by msm and doesn’t meet your narrative isn’t peer reviewed well enough…the conflicts are not relevant to you….

there are THOUSANDS of studies showing the fake vaccines cause immutable harms.

1250 Peer-Reviewed Publications:
Neurologic | Pulmonary | Cardiovascular | Gastrointestinal | Renal | Oncology | Ophthalmology | Ear Nose and Throat | Autoimmune | MIS-V | OBGYN | Miscellaneous

GO FIND THEM YOURSELF.

Or fall in line and just BELIEVE Bourla when he tells you there are no safety signals and no one has ever died from the experimental biological ever.
I’m not here to meet your end points. They are as irrelevant as you are. You can look at the excess death numbers worldwide rocketing higher in working age vaccinated men… twinks like you need these guys…so I would be VERY VERY CONCERNED. I know I am - and I didn’t even fall for the vaccination scam. How could you not be? You must be on your 5th stab by now, no?? Why do you avoid answering the question? Could it be that you are ashamed?
 
LacesOut said:
Yup. That’s why I posted it. You had no clue. Sounds like a BRIBE. LOOOOL

This is why idiots like you should never get involved in science. You have no clue what’s going on.
Just make Flat Whites and take more safe ‘vaccines’

How many shots, pincushion?
More...

7cqo3eka04ea1.jpg
 
LacesOut said:
And Pfizer sponsored their own safe and effective vaccine clinical trials. Many of them. All got the same falsified data. Rigged and manipulated. And YOU INJECTED YOURSELF BASED ON THEM. Conflicts don’t matter to you. You are walking living proof of a mass psychosis pincushion.
When is your next safe and effective vaccine? If you haven’t taken 5 then you clearly don’t believe in it.
More...

That's how clinical trials work, why will other companies sponsor trials for new drugs? What are you even babbling about? By your logic, Ivermectin isn't safe and effective since it's clinical trial was conducted by Merck.
 
LacesOut said:
Any study not provided to you by msm and doesn’t meet your narrative isn’t peer reviewed well enough…the conflicts are not relevant to you….

there are THOUSANDS of studies showing the fake vaccines cause immutable harms.

1250 Peer-Reviewed Publications:
Neurologic | Pulmonary | Cardiovascular | Gastrointestinal | Renal | Oncology | Ophthalmology | Ear Nose and Throat | Autoimmune | MIS-V | OBGYN | Miscellaneous

GO FIND THEM YOURSELF.

Or fall in line and just BELIEVE Bourla when he tells you there are no safety signals and no one has ever died from the experimental biological ever.
I’m not here to meet your end points. They are as irrelevant as you are. You can look at the excess death numbers worldwide rocketing higher in working age vaccinated men… twinks like you need these guys…so I would be VERY VERY CONCERNED. I know I am - and I didn’t even fall for the vaccination scam. How could you not be? You must be on your 5th stab by now, no?? Why do you avoid answering the question? Could it be that you are ashamed?
More...

I clicked on one and got this

Conclusions: In this study various neurological autoimmune disorders encountered following SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations are characterized. Given the assumed low incidence and mostly favourable outcome of autoimmune responses, the benefits of vaccinations outweigh the comparatively small risks.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34668274/

Aren't you tired of losing already? Why do you keep providing links that say the exact opposite of your claims? Can you provide link to a study that confirms your big claims of mass deaths? Or you gonna keep owning yourself?
 
exGOPer said:
That's how clinical trials work, why will other companies sponsor trials for new drugs? What are you even babbling about? By your logic, Ivermectin isn't safe and effective since it's clinical trial was conducted by Merck.
More...

Let's carefully read the Merck statement on Ivermectin and Covid.

Merck Statement on Ivermectin use During the COVID-19 Pandemic
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today affirmed its position regarding use of ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic. Company scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to-date, our analysis has identified:
  • No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;
  • No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;
  • A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.

Indications and Usage for STROMECTOL® (ivermectin)

Ivermectin is approved in the United States under the brand name STROMECTOL. STROMECTOL is indicated for the treatment of intestinal (i.e., nondisseminated) strongyloidiasis due to the nematode parasite Strongyloides stercoralis and for the treatment of onchocerciasis due to the nematode parasite Onchocerca volvulus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top