Diamond of ‘Diamond and Silk’ Dies Suddenly from COVID, Trump says 'heart gave out'

exGOPer said:
Why did you ignore this post @LacesOut

Authors of your study never disclosed of their conflicts of interest, it was pointed out by commentators on Cureus who then edited in the disclosures.

Also, the people who peer reviewed the study were picked by the authors of the paper and those peer reviewers never published a single paper, do you consider this a 'peer review'? It's same as getting your friends to grade your paper.
More...
Dude you don’t understand how peer review works.
Why don’t you answer: HOW MANY VACCINES DID YOU GET? LAST DOSE AND WHEN YOUR NEXT ONE IS PLANNED??
 
exGOPer said:
You keep ranting about Big Pharma and ignore that companies are sponsoring studies and paying doctor's to promote their drug which you then link to on these boards without a hint of irony.
More...
You promote vaccines from criminal enterprises who falsify and manipulate data in their own studies to lie and conceal true safety and efficacy. All while making billions. And you faint on couches about $1600. LOOOOL
Nothing has changed from the Itajai study. Conflicts have been added. The data is the same. Ivm wins.
 
LacesOut said:
Dude you don’t understand how peer review works.
Why don’t you answer: HOW MANY VACCINES DID YOU GET? LAST DOSE AND WHEN YOUR NEXT ONE IS PLANNED??
More...

Peer review doesn't mean you get your friends who never published a paper in their lives to certify a review when you refuse to even provide the data.

Do you know the authors of the study never published their data and cherry picked their propensity matching scores? Did you actually read the paper and comments on it?
 
Look at the dates on these. Guy claims he knew what was coming and warned people.

FnQmBOzXgBIYjXu.jpeg
 
LacesOut said:
You promote vaccines from criminal enterprises who falsify and manipulate data in their own studies to lie and conceal true safety and efficacy. All while making billions. And you faint on couches about $1600. LOOOOL
Nothing has changed from the Itajai study. Conflicts have been added. The data is the same. Ivm wins.
More...

You are not answering the question, Ivermectin manufacturers are bribing people to produce studies and then paying doctors - the very thing you apparently are vehemently against but you are ok with it because you are married to the Ivm narrative.
 
exGOPer said:
Peer review doesn't mean you get your friends who never published a paper in their lives to certify a review when you refuse to even provide the data.

Do you know the authors of the study never published their data and cherry picked their propensity matching scores? Did you actually read the paper and comments on it?
More...
Yup - you don’t know what peer review is. Thanks for confirming. HOW MANY DOSES? DATES AND PLANNED FUTURE DOSES?
 
exGOPer said:
You are not answering the question, Ivermectin manufacturers are bribing people to produce studies and then paying doctors - the very thing you apparently are vehemently against but you are ok with it because you are married to the Ivm narrative.
More...
Not a bribe. More lies like your entire original post. Brought to you by Pfizer.
HOW MANY DOSES?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top