DHS Goons Seize Vehicle For Emissions Issue

NO moron. He expanded their scope and abusiveness though.




Yep 2.4 Trillion we are going to suck out of the economy based on Obama's new guidelines to fight a phantom problem. On top of killing a ton of high paying jobs, and raising everyones energy prices.



The Environmental Protection Agency’s climate rules aimed at phasing out coal-fired power in favor of low-carbon fuels will come at a high cost, according to a newly released report.

Over the next two decades, the EPA’s rules to fight global warming will cost the economy $2.23 trillion, raise energy prices and lower families’ incomes.

Using economic models based on the federal government’s National Energy Model System, the conservative Heritage Foundation found that, by the end of 2023, EPA climate regulations will cost the U.S. nearly 600,000 jobs and reduce a family of four’s income by $1,200.

EPA rules would also raise energy prices and cost the economy $2.23 trillion from 2015 to 2038.

“Higher energy prices as a result of the regulations will squeeze both production and consumption. Since energy is a critical input for most goods and services, Americans will be hit repeatedly with higher prices as businesses pass higher costs onto consumers,” writes Nick Loris, a Heritage Foundation economist and co-author of the report.

“However, if a company had to absorb the costs, high energy costs would shrink profit margins and prevent businesses from investing and expanding,” Loris adds. “The cutbacks result in less output, fewer new jobs, and less income.”

Last summer, President Obama unveiled his Climate Action Plan, which heavily relied on capping carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. Federal regulators moved quickly to craft rules that would limit power plant emissions, eventually publishing such a rule earlier this year.

Obama doubled down on his climate agenda this year, saying that he would continue his push to move the country away from fossil fuels and towards low-carbon energy.

“The shift to a cleaner energy economy won’t happen overnight, and it will require tough choices along the way,” Obama said in his 2014 State of the Union Address. “But the debate is settled. Climate change is a fact. And when our children’s children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say, ‘Yes, we did.’”

But the EPA’s power plant emissions limits faced intense criticism for setting emissions limits for new coal plants impossibly low, effectively banning them unless they used carbon capture and storage technology (CCS). Such technology, however, is not commercially proven and the only known projects in the U.S. are federally funded.

House Republicans have questioned the legality of requiring new coal plants use CCS, when the Energy Policy Act of 2005 specifically prohibits the EPA from using federally-funded projects to prove that a technology is commercially proven.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/04/r...cost-the-economy-2-23-trillion/#ixzz390vWsACQ
 
American Geophysical Union

"Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5
 
This episode reminds me of the Bundy ranch seige. It is an administrative issue. Why in the world is it necessary or appropriate to send a gang of armed goons out to these people's house to seize their car?

It's almost like they are hoping that someone overreacts and starts shooting, so they have an excuse for even more repression.

Then there is the issue of the feds coming down hard on ordinary Americans, while they ignore the lawlessness on the southern border. Every spare federal agent should be down there guarding the border. Instead they are seizing cars for pollution vioilations.

It seems that john Edwards was right about there being two Americas. If you are an illegal immigrant gang banger, you can pretty much ignore all our laws and Obama is fine with that. You can violate our immigraiton laws, work illegally using a stolen identity, don't pay any taxes, drive around in your low rider with no insurance or registration, vote illegally and of course suck up all the welfare La Raza can get for you.

John Q. Public however, whose ancestors came here on the Mayflower, has to watch his step. The IRS is ready to pounce, a variety of government busybodies from school teachers to local police are watching his every move. Rush told about a woman in Florida who was arrested and charged with child neglect for letting her kid walk to the local park and play. I don't know if it was negligent of her or not, but wouldn't a talk with the police been enough? Was it really necessary to arrest her, throw her in jail, charge her with a serious felony that will likely bankrupt the family fighting?
 
This episode reminds me of the Bundy ranch seige. It is an administrative issue. Why in the world is it necessary or appropriate to send a gang of armed goons out to these people's house to seize their car?

It's almost like they are hoping that someone overreacts and starts shooting, so they have an excuse for even more repression.

Then there is the issue of the feds coming down hard on ordinary Americans, while they ignore the lawlessness on the southern border. Every spare federal agent should be down there guarding the border. Instead they are seizing cars for pollution vioilations.

It seems that john Edwards was right about there being two Americas. If you are an illegal immigrant gang banger, you can pretty much ignore all our laws and Obama is fine with that. You can violate our immigraiton laws, work illegally using a stolen identity, don't pay any taxes, drive around in your low rider with no insurance or registration, vote illegally and of course suck up all the welfare La Raza can get for you.

John Q. Public however, whose ancestors came here on the Mayflower, has to watch his step. The IRS is ready to pounce, a variety of government busybodies from school teachers to local police are watching his every move. Rush told about a woman in Florida who was arrested and charged with child neglect for letting her kid walk to the local park and play. I don't know if it was negligent of her or not, but wouldn't a talk with the police been enough? Was it really necessary to arrest her, throw her in jail, charge her with a serious felony that will likely bankrupt the family fighting?
Our federal govt is no longer protecting and serving us the citizens

attachment.php
 
Back
Top