Quote from vikana:
just a note of caution: the GPU's do all sorts of funny things to the floating point numbers to calculate fast. Remember, that the precision ultimately just needs to be one pixel (I realize this is a simplification, but anyway).
A better choice might be some of the AMD based cards that offer additional CPUs via MPI or something like that.
Quote from nitro:
Does anyone know where I can find an implementation of the Discrete Fourier Transform (FFT) that runs on the graphics card?
If I remember correctly, the specialized processors in the graphics card would be much faster than computing it by the CPU.
nitro
nitro,Quote from nitro:
Does anyone know where I can find an implementation of the Discrete Fourier Transform (FFT) that runs on the graphics card?
If I remember correctly, the specialized processors in the graphics card would be much faster than computing it by the CPU.
nitro

I just realized how interesting that is. I am really excited about the Cell processor. Thanks for the information.Quote from HLB:
CELL-based blades are much better choice, than GPUs or COTS-based MPI clusters. One guy on Willmot board claims, that he replaced 10 servers with one CELL for Monte-Carlo simulations...
But if one wants to play safe, then better stick with COTS cluster.